[NSRCA-discussion] Zippy 5S pack weight findings
Ronald Van Putte
vanputter at gmail.com
Mon May 13 06:43:14 AKDT 2013
I use 2800-3000 mah in a Master class schedule. I use a Himax F3A motor turning an APC 20.5x14 prop in my Vanquish
Ron
On May 13, 2013, at 5:54 AM, Vicente Planes wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Interesting that you use only 2000 mah. I use at least 3200 mah. The average is over 3500 mah. Probably is just the Kansas winds.
>
> VB
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On May 12, 2013, at 8:52 PM, Jim Quinn <jaqfly at prodigy.net> wrote:
>
>> I switched to the NanoTech batteries this year.They are 5S 4000 25~50 C.
>> I only have 6 cycles on my four flight packs.
>> Usually a Masters sequence uses about 2000mah, about 50% of the battery.
>> They weigh 7oz+ less than my Zippys.
>> I've used my Zippys about 100cycles each andd they still had good power.
>> The cost of Nanos was about the same as the Zippys.
>> For my money I'll stick with Nanos!
>>
>>
>> Jim Quinn
>>
>> --- On Sun, 5/12/13, Bob Kane <getterflash at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Bob Kane <getterflash at yahoo.com>
>> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Zippy 5S pack weight findings
>> To: "nsrca" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Date: Sunday, May 12, 2013, 12:02 PM
>>
>> I own two different types of Zippy lipo packs, all 5000mAH, 5S, 25C. I have 4 older copies of the "regular" pack, 4 copies of the Zippy Compact , and 2 new copies of the regular pack. I was getting the newest set ready to use and noticed they seemed heavier than the older packs. I compared them, and found the new packs to be made up of slightly thicker cells and the wires were heavier gauge. I weighed them all, and these are the results:
>>
>> Old Zippy 25C: 640g/pack (45.2 oz total for two packs)
>> New Zippy 25C: 690g/pack (48.7 oz total for two packs)
>> Zippy Compact 25C: 600g/pack (42.3 oz total for two packs)
>>
>> The HK website shows the weight of the regular 25C pack as 640g, they must not have not checked the new stock.
>>
>> Bob Kane
>> getterflash at yahoo.com
>>
>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20130513/1cc60beb/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list