[NSRCA-discussion] What a difference a year makes

Wed Mar 20 14:16:09 AKDT 2013

Derek,

My apologies if your degree is not in accounting.  It is my genuine belief/understanding that if it is not accounting, it is something similar and your expertise is in accounting/finance/banking, and not science.  But it was not I that made this personal, and perhaps that is the point I should have made.

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Derek Koopowitz
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 6:13 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] What a difference a year makes

And your assumption that I have an accounting degree speaks volumes for your arrogance.

Sent from my iPad

On Mar 20, 2013, at 3:09 PM, "Dave Lockhart" <DaveL322 at comcast.net> wrote:

And your accounting degree in comparison to my geology degree and career in the environmental field?  J  You might want to walk that one back a bit.

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Derek Koopowitz
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 5:48 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] What a difference a year makes

Dave the scientist now... LOL

Sent from my iPad

On Mar 20, 2013, at 1:17 PM, "Dave Lockhart" <DaveL322 at comcast.net> wrote:

The reason for that is some of the same “scientists” that (wrongly) touted global cooling in the 1970s are the same ones now (wrongly) preaching global warming.

The simple change of language from “global warming” to “climate change” should be proof enough that global warming is not happening.  However, the politicians and greenies that used “global warming” as justification for bigger government and more government control of the private sector do not want to lose that traction as the fraud of global warming is being disproven.  So they (the politicians and greenies) are now using “climate change” in a desperate attempt to tie any naturally occurring climate condition to human influence.  If the politicians were really concerned about the environment, wouldn’t they prefer the US drill in international waters rather than leaving it to the Chinese?  Does anyone think the Chinese will drill as cleanly as the US?  In the case of the greenies, it is nothing other than short sighted…..the idea that they stop the US from drilling is a victory….never mind that the planet is worse off when the Chinese drill instead.  I’m not suggesting environmental impacts of human activity should not be considered, just that the interaction be reasonable and considerate of the big picture and long term.

Rant over.

Dave 

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ronald Van Putte
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 1:48 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] What a difference a year makes

A "global warming" fanatic explained to me that it causes "extremes in temperature fluctuations", including cold.  I asked why I couldn't say that "global cooling" causes "extremes in temperature fluctuations", including hot and he was very peeved with me.

Ron

On Mar 20, 2013, at 10:16 AM, Larry Diamond wrote:

Hmmm, How does that Global Warming thing work again? Haven't heard much about that lately... I guess they have cooled down a bit... :^)

From: Mike Mueller <mikemueller at f3aunlimited.com>
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 9:09 AM
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] What a difference a year makes

 Last year on 3/20/12 we hit a high of 85 degrees in Chicago

 Today the high is going to reach 25 degrees.

 60 degree swing????? 

 What ever happened to moderation?

 Too hot too cold too dry too wet.

 It's crazy.

 Bottom line is everyone is tired of winter around here. Hoping for a change soon.

 Mike Mueller

_______________________________________________NSRCA-discussion mailing listNSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.orghttp://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20130320/15577a04/attachment.html>