[NSRCA-discussion] Banquet Plans

[Ronald Van Putte]

Having been responsible for many Nats banquets, I can sympathize with the problems encountered in organizing them.

I was actually enjoying the banquet last year, until the room started to fill up.  It was obvious that there were more attendees than had been planned for.  It got bad in a hurry because the room was so small.

Ron

On Jun 7, 2013, at 1:05 PM, mike mueller wrote:

> I think everyone knows it didn't work out as planned. Besides that hiccup last years Nats was great.
>  Banquest are always hard to organize.
>  
> Mike Mueller
>  
> 
> From: Ronald Van Putte <vanputter at gmail.com>
> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
> Sent: Friday, June 7, 2013 12:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Banquet Plans
> 
> Amen!
> 
> Ron
> 
> On Jun 7, 2013, at 12:24 PM, <mjfrederick at cox.net> wrote:
> 
> > I don't think I'm going to make it to the Nats this year, but I hope for everyone's sake the plans are different from last year. I say that because last year I paid to attend the banquet (along with several people I traveled with) and we ended up leaving and eating elsewhere because it was too darn crowded in that room.
> > 
> > Matt Frederick
> > 
> > 
> > ---- Keith Hoard <klhoard at hotmail.com> wrote: 
> > What the plan for Eats this year?
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20130607/c311077c/attachment.html>