[NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging cert test
Michael S. Harrison
drmikedds at sbcglobal.net
Fri Jul 12 08:40:13 AKDT 2013
good idea.
-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Atwood, Mark
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 7:36 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging cert test
Hey Gary,
Can I alter that request slightly? Can we make the RE certification test
multiple choice, and leave the original as is? I say this because the
first time through, this really does force you to read the book
completely.which is the goal. The re-cert should be designed to focus on
changes to the rules, not the full body of rules. I'm pretty sure by your
5th time through you know the 15 degree rule.
Mark Atwood
Paragon Consulting, Inc. | President
5885 Landerbrook Drive Suite 130, Cleveland Ohio, 44124
Direct: 440.229.2502 | Fax: 440.684.3102
www.paragon-inc.com<http://www.paragon-inc.com/>
[cid:image001.png at 01CE481F.E6A56C70]
On Jul 12, 2013, at 8:15 AM, w d
<whodaddy10 at gmail.com<mailto:whodaddy10 at gmail.com>> wrote:
et all NSRCA board members.
AS a MEMBER of the NSRCA I make an official request proposing that the cert
test be changed to ALL multiple choice questions. And that all fill in the
blank questions should be eliminated from the online certification exam..
Fill in the blank questions should only be allowed for live in person
seminars.
Reading the various posts on the lists.The fill in the are the sticking
point for most of the members..
Gary Courtney
NSRCA #3902
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Derek Koopowitz
<derekkoopowitz at gmail.com<mailto:derekkoopowitz at gmail.com>> wrote:
That's what I'm thinking... 2000 words at least.
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 11, 2013, at 10:06 PM, Keith Hoard
<klhoard at hotmail.com<mailto:klhoard at hotmail.com>> wrote:
I think if y'all keep complaining, Derek will change the test to free
response Essay.
Keith Hoard
Collierville, TN
On Jul 11, 2013, at 23:56, "Jeff and Claire"
<jeffclaire at cableone.net<mailto:jeffclaire at cableone.net>> wrote:
That's what I did- downloaded the book. Those fill in the blank questions
were word for word right out of the book. First year in pattern, so it took
me two hours but I learned a lot in the process and passed it on the first
try.
Jeff
From:
nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lis
ts.nsrca.org> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of
Jon Lowe
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 9:51 PM
To: w d
Cc: NSRCA
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging cert test
Guys, this isn't this hard. It's open book! If you download the rulebook,
and just read it to find the answer, it's easy. I can't figure it what
y'alls problem is. Heck, the rule book gives you the spelling too!
Jon
w d <whodaddy10 at gmail.com<mailto:whodaddy10 at gmail.com>> wrote:
to whom ever
some of the answers on the cert test are lacking in thought and are just
down right bull $&^+... exact words, spelling,, Im not an english major i
speak engrish i shouldnt have to spell it Gary
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Ken Velez
<kvelez at rochester.rr.com<mailto:kvelez at rochester.rr.com>> wrote:
I was doing a 5hr test flight into Little Rock AR on one of my customers
acft and while enroute I took my iPad and took the test at FL430. I failed
the test with a 74% do to my choice of words in some of the blanks. Rule
book not available at the time I took the test. Now I have to re do it.
Maybe if at the end of the test it would give you the chance to verify or
correct the questions that were not answered correctly instead of having to
take the whole test again, won't be as annoying.
Just my thought.
Ken
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
"Atwood, Mark" <atwoodm at paragon-inc.com<mailto:atwoodm at paragon-inc.com>>
wrote:
I just took the AMA test (and passed thankfully!). How long before the site
list is updated to reflect that?
Regarding the test itself, I was able to pass with 85% from memory. The
questions missed though were extremely annoying, in that it was a matter of
trying to guess the correct sequence of words. I think the single word
fill in the blanks were ok. It's the 5 word sequences that include trivial
words like "to" that seem to need revising.
Mark Atwood
Paragon Consulting, Inc. | President
5885 Landerbrook Drive Suite 130, Cleveland Ohio, 44124
Direct: 440.229.2502<tel:440.229.2502> | Fax:
440.684.3102<tel:440.684.3102>
www.paragon-inc.com<http://www.paragon-inc.com/><http://www.paragon-inc.com/
>
[cid:image001.png at 01CE481F.E6A56C70]
On Jul 11, 2013, at 10:38 PM, Astropattern
<astropattern at yahoo.com<mailto:astropattern at yahoo.com><mailto:astropattern at y
ahoo.com<mailto:astropattern at yahoo.com>>> wrote:
I agree with Derek that it's tough to set a stand alone test that everyone
agrees with and that isn't so tough that it discourages participation.
As time goes by, and the general level of judging gets better (or the
downgrades become increasingly common knowledge and well-understood), there
will be a need to raise the bar on the certification process and someone
will need to put in some hard work to push us to the next level.
John
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 11, 2013, at 6:40 PM, Charlie Rock
<charlierock at me.com<mailto:charlierock at me.com><mailto:charlierock at me.com<mai
lto:charlierock at me.com>>> wrote:
I totally agree with John on this one!!i for one glad no class at AMA Hq to
qualify for judging, but format leaves a lot to be desired!!
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when
it deserves it!!!
Mark Twain
On Jul 11, 2013, at 5:59 PM, John Ford
<astropattern at yahoo.com<mailto:astropattern at yahoo.com><mailto:astropattern at y
ahoo.com<mailto:astropattern at yahoo.com>>> wrote:
I did them both.the system worked OK.but still disappointed with the
format.you can know what you are talking about but still fail the test if
you don't use the exact words. The test probably forces people to read the
book that would otherwise never do first off, but as a re-certification
test, it is more a memory puzzle than anything else.
Better than sitting in a hot room for an hour in a sweaty t-shirt at the end
of a day, though.
John
On Jul 11, 2013, at 12:10 PM, Michael S. Harrison
<drmikedds at sbcglobal.net<mailto:drmikedds at sbcglobal.net><mailto:drmikedds at sb
cglobal.net<mailto:drmikedds at sbcglobal.net>>> wrote:
I just finished the AMA recertification test. It was a huge Pain in the A.
From:
nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lis
ts.nsrca.org><mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-d
iscussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>>
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion-bou
nces at lists.nsrca.org><mailto:discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:discu
ssion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>>] On Behalf Of Michael S. Harrison
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 11:41 AM
To: 'General pattern discussion'
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging
I am having no luck. Am I certified? Can someone look for me?
thanks
Mike
From:
nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lis
ts.nsrca.org><mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-d
iscussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>>
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion-bou
nces at lists.nsrca.org><mailto:discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:discu
ssion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>>] On Behalf Of Jon Lowe
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 11:06 AM
To:
nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org><ma
ilto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.or
g>>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging
Because AMA and FAI are on different rules cycles, a year apart. Happened
several cycles ago. AMA Masters and Advanced sequences and rules changed
for this year. FAI changed in 2012.
Jon
-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Hochhalter
<cahochhalter at yahoo.com<mailto:cahochhalter at yahoo.com><mailto:cahochhalter at y
ahoo.com<mailto:cahochhalter at yahoo.com>>>
To: General pattern discussion
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org><m
ailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.o
rg>>>
Sent: Wed, Jul 10, 2013 10:59 am
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging Thanks Jon, but how does that
happen?
C
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 10, 2013, at 10:56 AM, Jon Lowe
<jonlowe at aol.com<mailto:jonlowe at aol.com><mailto:jonlowe at aol.com<mailto:jonlo
we at aol.com>>> wrote:
Chuck,
I was partially incorrect. You show as current for FAI, but not AMA.
For all,
As Derek said, you MUST sign in to the site to see the judges list. You do
NOT have to be an NSRCA member to get a login. On the pull down, you can
sort by various means (last name, district, etc).
Keith,
It's only a flesh wound...
Jon
-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Hochhalter
<cahochhalter at yahoo.com<mailto:cahochhalter at yahoo.com><mailto:cahochhalter at y
ahoo.com<mailto:cahochhalter at yahoo.com>>>
To: General pattern discussion
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org><m
ailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.o
rg>>>
Sent: Wed, Jul 10, 2013 10:31 am
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging Time for some Monty python
quotes.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 10, 2013, at 9:38 AM, "Keith Hoard"
<klhoard at hotmail.com<mailto:klhoard at hotmail.com><mailto:klhoard at hotmail.com<
mailto:klhoard at hotmail.com>>> wrote:
Uh, huh . . . feeling oppressed yet?
From:
mikemueller at f3aunlimited.com<mailto:mikemueller at f3aunlimited.com><mailto:mik
emueller at f3aunlimited.com<mailto:mikemueller at f3aunlimited.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:37 AM
To: General pattern
discussion<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at l
ists.nsrca.org>>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging
Ok I don't see where that is Jon. I see a drop down on the top that leads to
the wrong list like John but nothing on the right. Am I on the right
site?????
Also I thought it had to be everyother year like Chuck and I certified
before the Nats last year. It's every year now?
Thanks, Mike
Mike Mueller
F3Aunlimited
From: Jon Lowe
<jonlowe at aol.com<mailto:jonlowe at aol.com><mailto:jonlowe at aol.com<mailto:jonlo
we at aol.com>>>
To:
nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org><ma
ilto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.or
g>>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:24 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging
On the right hand side of the screen there is a pull down menu where you
select the Certified Judges list. Not real obvious, I will admit.
Jon
-----Original Message-----
From: John Fuqua
<johnfuqua at embarqmail.com<mailto:johnfuqua at embarqmail.com><mailto:johnfuqua@
embarqmail.com<mailto:johnfuqua at embarqmail.com>>>
To: 'General pattern discussion'
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org><m
ailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.o
rg>>>
Sent: Wed, Jul 10, 2013 9:19 am
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging Scott/Derek If you go to the
website and click on judging/certification/certified judges list you get
this list "This list will produce a list of all registered members of the
website that have verified their email addresses. This is not a list of
NSRCA members."'
What you do not get is a list of certified judges. For that you must go to
Lists/membership lists. ????????????
John
From:
nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lis
ts.nsrca.org><mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-d
iscussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>>
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion-bou
nces at lists.nsrca.org>?] On Behalf Of Archie Stafford
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:58 AM
To:
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org><ma
ilto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.or
g>>
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging
There are still quite a few people attending the NATS who have not taken the
judging certification test. You are REQUIRED to be certified to judge at
the NATS. If you are not certified, that means you miss a judging session
and will lose your highest round.
Please take the time, if you have not done so to go to the NSRCA site and
complete the judging test...
Arch
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org><ma
ilto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.or
g>>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org><ma
ilto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.or
g>>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
________________________________
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org><ma
ilto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.or
g>>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org><ma
ilto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.or
g>>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org><ma
ilto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.or
g>>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org><ma
ilto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.or
g>>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org><ma
ilto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.or
g>>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org><ma
ilto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.or
g>>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org><ma
ilto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.or
g>>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org><ma
ilto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.or
g>>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org><ma
ilto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.or
g>>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list