[NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging

Derek Koopowitz derekkoopowitz at gmail.com
Thu Jul 11 12:08:53 AKDT 2013


I would challenge you to define an automated test that can take into
account every potential synonym, spelling, wording, etc. that is possible
with this type of test short of making it a totally multiple choice, which
in my view, is not the way anyone should be tested.


On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Ronald Van Putte <vanputter at gmail.com>wrote:

> Reminded me of a test in 6th grade English class, which expected exact
> words from the text to be inserted in the blanks.  No synonyms allowed.
>
> Ron
>
> On Jul 11, 2013, at 12:10 PM, Michael S. Harrison wrote:
>
> I just finished the AMA recertification test.  It was a huge Pain in the A.
> ****
> ** **
> *From:* nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:
> nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] *On Behalf Of *Michael S.
> Harrison
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 10, 2013 11:41 AM
> *To:* 'General pattern discussion'
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging****
> ** **
> I am having no luck.  Am I certified?  Can someone look for me?****
> thanks****
> Mike****
> ** **
> *From:* nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:
> nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] *On Behalf Of *Jon Lowe
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 10, 2013 11:06 AM
> *To:* nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging****
> ** **
> Because AMA and FAI are on different rules cycles, a year apart.  Happened
> several cycles ago.  AMA Masters and Advanced sequences and rules changed
> for this year.  FAI changed in 2012.****
> Jon****
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck Hochhalter <cahochhalter at yahoo.com>
> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Wed, Jul 10, 2013 10:59 am
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging****
> Thanks Jon, but how does that happen?****
> ** **
> C
>
> Sent from my iPhone****
>
>
> On Jul 10, 2013, at 10:56 AM, Jon Lowe <jonlowe at aol.com> wrote:****
>
> Chuck,****
> I was partially incorrect.  You show as current for FAI, but not AMA.****
>  ****
> For all,****
> As Derek said, you MUST sign in to the site to see the judges list.  You
> do NOT have to be an NSRCA member to get a login.  On the pull down, you
> can sort by various means (last name, district, etc).****
>  ****
> Keith,****
> It's only a flesh wound...****
> Jon****
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck Hochhalter <cahochhalter at yahoo.com>
> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Wed, Jul 10, 2013 10:31 am
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging****
> Time for some Monty python quotes.
>
> Sent from my iPhone****
>
>
> On Jul 10, 2013, at 9:38 AM, "Keith Hoard" <klhoard at hotmail.com> wrote:***
> *
>
> Uh, huh . . . feeling oppressed yet?****
>  ****
> *From:* mikemueller at f3aunlimited.com****
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:37 AM****
> *To:* General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>****
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging****
>  ****
> Ok I don't see where that is Jon. I see a drop down on the top that leads
> to the wrong list like John but nothing on the right. Am I on the right
> site?????****
> Also I thought it had to be everyother year like Chuck and I certified
> before the Nats last year. It's every year now?****
> Thanks, Mike****
>  ****
> Mike Mueller****
> F3Aunlimited****
>  ****
> *From:* Jon Lowe <jonlowe at aol.com>
> *To:* nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:24 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging****
>  ****
> On the right hand side of the screen there is a pull down menu where you
> select the Certified Judges list.  Not real obvious, I will admit.****
> Jon****
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Fuqua <johnfuqua at embarqmail.com>
> To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Wed, Jul 10, 2013 9:19 am
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging****
> Scott/Derek****
> If you go to the website and click on judging/certification/certified
> judges list you get this list “This list will produce a list of all
> registered members of the website that have verified their email
> addresses.  This is not a list of NSRCA members.”’****
>  ****
> What you do not get is a list of certified judges.  For that you must go
> to Lists/membership lists.   ????????????****
>  ****
> John****
>  ****
> *From:* nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [
> mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org?<nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org?>
> ] *On Behalf Of *Archie Stafford
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:58 AM
> *To:* NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> *Subject:* [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging****
>  ****
> There are still quite a few people attending the NATS who have not taken
> the judging certification test.  You are REQUIRED to be certified to judge
> at the NATS.  If you are not certified, that means you miss a judging
> session and will lose your highest round. ****
>  ****
> Please take the time, if you have not done so to go to the NSRCA site and
> complete the judging test...****
>  ****
> Arch****
>
> _______________________________________________****
>
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list****
>
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org****
>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion****
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion****
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion****
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion****
>
> _______________________________________________****
>
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list****
>
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org****
>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion****
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion****
>
> _______________________________________________****
>
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list****
>
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org****
>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion****
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20130711/6d65d682/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list