[NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging

Jon Lowe jonlowe at aol.com
Wed Jul 10 09:01:10 AKDT 2013


You are certified for FAI, but not AMA.

Jon


-----Original Message-----
From: Michael S. Harrison <drmikedds at sbcglobal.net>
To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Wed, Jul 10, 2013 11:41 am
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging



I am having no luck.  Am I certified?  Can someone look for me?
thanks
Mike 
 

From:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Jon Lowe
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 11:06 AM
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging

 

BecauseAMA and FAI are on different rules cycles, a year apart.  Happened severalcycles ago.  AMA Masters and Advanced sequences and rules changed for thisyear.  FAI changed in 2012.

Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Hochhalter <cahochhalter at yahoo.com>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Wed, Jul 10, 2013 10:59 am
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging


Thanks Jon, but how does that happen?

 

C

Sent from my iPhone


On Jul 10, 2013, at 10:56 AM, Jon Lowe <jonlowe at aol.com>wrote:


Chuck,

Iwas partially incorrect.  You show as current for FAI, but not AMA.

 

Forall,

AsDerek said, you MUST sign in to the site to see the judges list.  You doNOT have to be an NSRCA member to get a login.  On the pull down, you cansort by various means (last name, district, etc).

 

Keith,

It'sonly a flesh wound...

Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Hochhalter <cahochhalter at yahoo.com>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Wed, Jul 10, 2013 10:31 am
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging


Time for some Monty python quotes.

Sent from my iPhone


On Jul 10, 2013, at 9:38 AM, "Keith Hoard" <klhoard at hotmail.com> wrote:



Uh, huh . . . feeling oppressed yet?


 


From: mikemueller at f3aunlimited.com

Sent:Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:37 AM

To: General pattern discussion 

Subject: Re:[NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging


 



Ok Idon't see where that is Jon. I see a drop down on the top that leads to thewrong list like John but nothing on the right. Am I on the right site?????

Also I thought it had to beeveryother year like Chuck and I certified before the Nats last year. It'severy year now?

Thanks, Mike

 

MikeMueller

F3Aunlimited

 


From: Jon Lowe<jonlowe at aol.com>
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:24 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging


 


On the right hand side of the screen there is a pull down menuwhere you select the Certified Judges list.  Not real obvious, I willadmit.

Jon

-----OriginalMessage-----
From: John Fuqua <johnfuqua at embarqmail.com>
To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Wed, Jul 10, 2013 9:19 am
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging


Scott/Derek

If you go to the website andclick on judging/certification/certified judges list you get this list “Thislist will produce a list of all registered members of the website that haveverified their email addresses.  This is not a list of NSRCA members.”’

 

What you do not get is a list ofcertified judges.  For that you must go to Lists/membershiplists.   ????????????

 

John

 


From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org?]On Behalf Of Archie Stafford
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:58 AM
To: NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging


 


There are still quite a fewpeople attending the NATS who have not taken the judging certificationtest.  You are REQUIRED to be certified to judge at the NATS.  If youare not certified, that means you miss a judging session and will lose yourhighest round.  


 


Please take the time, if you havenot done so to go to the NSRCA site and complete the judging test...


 


Arch




_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion




_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion




_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20130710/f88e3bf4/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list