[NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

[Keith Hoard]

I doubt that “intelligent” would be the word Ambassador Stevens and the three other dead Americans would have used to describe her just before the Al Queida fighters got to them after 8 hours of begging for help.

From: Phil S. 
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 5:50 PM
To: General pattern discussion 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

I can't tell if you are totally joking, or what, Mike.  However, I will say she is an extremely intelligent woman, and has done a lot for this country as Secy. of State.  As a husband of 50+ years to an intelligent woman, and the father of two very intelligent daughters (one an engineer and the other a PhD), I totally approve of intelligence in women.  Condy Rice was/is also intelligent, to balance the political spectrum.  As I told my granddaughter (also very intelligent) the world would be a better place if more women were in power positions.

OK, flame suit on...

Phil Spelt, KCRC Past President
AMA 1294 Scientific Leader Member
SPA 177 Board Member
(865)435-1476v, (865)604-0541c
On 1/24/2013 6:27 PM, Michael Cohen wrote: 
  I'll be the buzz kill....
   
  How many people think Hillary Clinton is a hot babe!  The way she testifies....  That charges my LiPos....
   
  (NOT)
   
  Mike C
   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:08:42 -0500
  From: chuenkan at comcast.net
  To: ldiamond at diamondrc.com; nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

  Yeah, my "drive" went soft years ago...

Phil Spelt, KCRC Past President
AMA 1294 Scientific Leader Member
SPA 177 Board Member
(865)435-1476v, (865)604-0541c
  On 1/24/2013 12:50 PM, Larry Diamond wrote: 
    Get a soft drive, I hear they are more flexible... Bahahahahaha


    From: Scott McHarg mailto:scmcharg at gmail.com
    To: General pattern discussion mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
    Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 11:03 AM
    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY


    Y'all are taking up valueless space on my hard drive.



    On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Keith Hoard <klhoard at hotmail.com> wrote:

      http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Count_in_octal#C.2B.2B

      From: Randy Forbus 
      Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 11:00 AM
      To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
      Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

      Its gettin deep in here today


      From: rob at koolsoft.com
      To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
      Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:59:10 +0000
      Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY


      Made the same mistake I almost made.  Octal is 0-7 so 0AB would be 12-13-14

      -          Robert Beaubien
      -          Sr. Software Architect
      -          Kool Software LLC

      "No trees were harmed in the sending of this message, however a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced."

      From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Keith Hoard
      Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 9:52 AM
      To: General pattern discussion
      Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

      00 – 12 - 13

      From: Ed Alt 
      Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:47 AM
      To: General pattern discussion 
      Cc: General pattern discussion 
      Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

      Can you please express that in octal?


      Sent from my iPhone

      On Jan 24, 2013, at 11:31 AM, "Keith Hoard" <klhoard at hotmail.com> wrote:
        Hmmm, that’s weird.  He asked for us to NOT REPLY, but I find myself strangely drawn to reply anyway . . . Oh yeah, (for the programmers –> 0AB )

        From: Larry Diamond 
        Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 8:23 AM
        To: General pattern discussion 
        Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

        OK, I won't reply... again !!!!!!

        From: Ken Velez <kvelez at rochester.rr.com>
        To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
        Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 1:41 AM
        Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

        There is always one… lol 789

        From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ed Alt
        Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 2:41 AM
        To: 'General pattern discussion'
        Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

        456

        From: Ken Velez 
        Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 2:33 AM
        To: 'General pattern discussion' 
        Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

        123
        _______________________________________________
        NSRCA-discussion mailing list
        NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
        http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

        _______________________________________________
        NSRCA-discussion mailing list
        NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
        http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
        _______________________________________________
        NSRCA-discussion mailing list
        NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
        http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
        _______________________________________________
        NSRCA-discussion mailing list
        NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
        http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
      _______________________________________________
      NSRCA-discussion mailing list
      NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
      http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

      _______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
      _______________________________________________
      NSRCA-discussion mailing list
      NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
      http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

      _______________________________________________
      NSRCA-discussion mailing list
      NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
      http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion





    -- 
    Scott A. McHarg
    Sr. Systems Engineer - Infrastructure


    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
  _______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20130125/bbee2908/attachment.html>