[NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

Keith Hoard klhoard at hotmail.com
Thu Jan 24 08:24:46 AKST 2013


http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Count_in_octal#C.2B.2B

From: Randy Forbus 
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 11:00 AM
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

Its gettin deep in here today



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: rob at koolsoft.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:59:10 +0000
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY


Made the same mistake I almost made.  Octal is 0-7 so 0AB would be 12-13-14



-          Robert Beaubien

-          Sr. Software Architect

-          Kool Software LLC



"No trees were harmed in the sending of this message, however a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced."



From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Keith Hoard
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 9:52 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY



00 – 12 - 13



From: Ed Alt 

Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:47 AM

To: General pattern discussion 

Cc: General pattern discussion 

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY



Can you please express that in octal?



Sent from my iPhone


On Jan 24, 2013, at 11:31 AM, "Keith Hoard" <klhoard at hotmail.com> wrote:

  Hmmm, that’s weird.  He asked for us to NOT REPLY, but I find myself strangely drawn to reply anyway . . . Oh yeah, (for the programmers –> 0AB )



  From: Larry Diamond 

  Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 8:23 AM

  To: General pattern discussion 

  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY



  OK, I won't reply... again !!!!!!



  From: Ken Velez <kvelez at rochester.rr.com>
  To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
  Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 1:41 AM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY



  There is always one… lol 789



  From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ed Alt
  Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 2:41 AM
  To: 'General pattern discussion'
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY



  456



  From: Ken Velez 

  Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 2:33 AM

  To: 'General pattern discussion' 

  Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY



  123

  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20130124/1971f884/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list