[NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
Keith Hoard
klhoard at hotmail.com
Thu Jan 24 08:24:46 AKST 2013
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Count_in_octal#C.2B.2B
From: Randy Forbus
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 11:00 AM
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
Its gettin deep in here today
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: rob at koolsoft.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:59:10 +0000
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
Made the same mistake I almost made. Octal is 0-7 so 0AB would be 12-13-14
- Robert Beaubien
- Sr. Software Architect
- Kool Software LLC
"No trees were harmed in the sending of this message, however a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced."
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Keith Hoard
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 9:52 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
00 – 12 - 13
From: Ed Alt
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:47 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Cc: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
Can you please express that in octal?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 24, 2013, at 11:31 AM, "Keith Hoard" <klhoard at hotmail.com> wrote:
Hmmm, that’s weird. He asked for us to NOT REPLY, but I find myself strangely drawn to reply anyway . . . Oh yeah, (for the programmers –> 0AB )
From: Larry Diamond
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 8:23 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
OK, I won't reply... again !!!!!!
From: Ken Velez <kvelez at rochester.rr.com>
To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 1:41 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
There is always one… lol 789
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ed Alt
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 2:41 AM
To: 'General pattern discussion'
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
456
From: Ken Velez
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 2:33 AM
To: 'General pattern discussion'
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
123
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20130124/1971f884/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list