[NSRCA-discussion] 2013 NATS dates

Scott McHarg scmcharg at gmail.com
Mon Feb 25 12:33:43 AKST 2013


With all due respect to a very nice guy and a guy very involved with what
goes on, I do not necessarily agree with your reason being over.  The NSRCA
does not have much say on how it is run at all.  I will admit that they, at
the very least, listen to our concerns now but the AMA runs the show.


On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Ronald Van Putte <vanputter at gmail.com>wrote:

> We had N-PAC because AMA refused to permit NSRCA to have any say on how
> the Nats were run.  That reason is over.  Now we have to compete for Nats
> time with other SIGs.  In my opinion, the best way to do that is to
> increase the number of Nats competitors in R/C Aerobatics.
>
> Ron
>
> On Feb 25, 2013, at 3:19 PM, Scott McHarg wrote:
>
> We also used to have NPAC.  Now, we have to do what we can within the
> framework of the AMA and their time restraints.  It is very unfortunate.
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Charlie Rock <charlierock at me.com> wrote:
>
>> And that is very very sad to hear!!! Charlie
>>
>> "When people are afraid of a government that is -  Tyranny; And a
>> government that is afraid of the people that is - Liberty."
>>  Thomas Jefferson
>>
>> On Feb 25, 2013, at 3:12 PM, Archie Stafford <astafford at md.metrocast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I completely agree Ron but those days are gone. The AMA is no longer
>> focused on competition like it used to be
>>
>> Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S™ III, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
>>
>>
>> -------- Original message --------
>> From: Ronald Van Putte <vanputter at gmail.com>
>> Date:
>> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2013 NATS dates
>>
>>
>> I know that "suck" and "blow" are opposites, but that situation both "sucks"
>> and "blows".  We used to have a designated "checkin/practice" day *and*a "rain" day.
>>
>> Ron
>>
>> On Feb 25, 2013, at 2:42 PM, Archie Stafford wrote:
>>
>> Mike,
>>
>> The AMA has shortened the total NATS period this year, so you read that
>> correct. Fortunately, our actual flying days were not changed.  Soaring
>> went from 13 days to 6 days this year. In previous years, it was never
>> truly our day, but it worked out that way as a day of setup for the
>> workers.  We have never had a true practice day, but since the sites were
>> free, they were available.  Sites 1 and 4 may be available, but that
>> remains to be seen.  Once Pylon is done then we will be able to use the
>> sites.  Think of it as how the others sites have worked on Saturdays in
>> previous years.
>>
>> Archie
>>
>>
>>
>> *On Mon 02/25/13 3:31 PM , mike mueller mups1953 at yahoo.com sent:
>> *
>>
>>   I have a question too.
>>  On the AMA site they show RC Pylon still being there on the Sunday the
>> 21st. If that's the case will it stop us from practicing on that day?
>> Thanks, Mike
>>
>> --- On *Mon, 2/25/13, Bob Kane *wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Bob Kane **
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2013 NATS dates
>> To: "General pattern discussion" **
>> Date: Monday, February 25, 2013, 2:23 PM
>>
>>   I sent a message on facebook, but here is my quesiton again via "real"
>> email . . .  .
>>
>>  Am I set to work site 1 again this year?  I am not going to try and
>> compete and work as I did last year, it did not work out very well.
>>
>>  Thanks.
>>
>> Bob Kane
>> getterflash at yahoo.com
>>   ------------------------------
>> *From:* Archie Stafford **
>> *To:* General pattern discussion **
>> *Sent:* Saturday, September 15, 2012 11:03 AM
>> *Subject:* [NSRCA-discussion] 2013 NATS dates
>> ****
>>
>> Just settled dates here at the NATS planning meeting. The official dates
>> are now set and I want to get it out early.
>>
>> July 21-25.
>> Check-In is July 21.
>> Intermediate & Advanced flying July 22-24
>> Masters and FAI Prelims July 22-24
>> Masters & FAI finals July 25
>>
>> Fees are the same as last year.
>> Early entry deadline:  June 24
>> Late deadline: July 8
>>
>> Fees will once again double after June 24. Refunds can be issued up to 24
>> hours prior to start, minus the AMA part,  so if you register early and
>> have to change, you can get your NSRCA fees back.
>>
>> Will update with more information later, but wanted to get the dates out
>> for planning purposes.
>>
>> Arch
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<http://us.mc1247.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org>
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<http://us.mc1247.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org>
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> ****
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Scott A. McHarg*
> Sr. Systems Engineer - Infrastructure
>  _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>



-- 
*Scott A. McHarg*
Sr. Systems Engineer - Infrastructure
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20130225/e19c3388/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list