[NSRCA-discussion] Very quiet on here

[Jon Lowe]

There was already a comment on the Canadian blog about the Trigantic's snaps.  This is an excerpt:

"Pretty much everyone left so we finished off our flights and then had the opportunity to see Gerhard Mayer fly his Trigantic Tri-winged plane. This is one deep fused plane and the tri-wing is definitely an eye catcher. In traditional Gerhard style he was very slow paced but the plane seemed to handle the light winds without much difficulty. The plane presents ok but the snaps are a departure from the norm for sure. I can see the age old questions returning already :-)"



Jon


-----Original Message-----
From: Ronald Van Putte <vanputter at gmail.com>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Sat, Aug 17, 2013 8:14 am
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Very quiet on here


Oh geez!  Lowe mentioned snaps.  Now we're in for more snap bedlam.


Ron


On Aug 17, 2013, at 8:09 AM, Jon Lowe wrote:


Yeah, but FAI places such emphasis on smoothness and gracefulness, I wonder how automation would handle that!  And EVERYONE would zero snaps, as the wings would never be truly stalled, and the data would prove it!

Jon


-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Kane <getterflash at yahoo.com>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Sat, Aug 17, 2013 8:02 am
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Very quiet on here



Automated judging, here we come . . . . . 

 
Bob Kane
getterflash at yahoo.com


  
 
 
 
   From: James Oddino <joddino at socal.rr.com>
 To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
 Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 5:01 PM
 Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Very quiet on here
  
 



Check this out at the following link.  It might lead to an interesting discussion:




http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1965012#post25863336







On Aug 16, 2013, at 9:27 AM, Jon Lowe wrote:


Very quiet.  Got an email from someone saying he wasn't getting copied, but looking at the archives, the last message posted was from Aug 12th, so I thought I'd test.

Jon
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


 
 
  


_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

 
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion




_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20130817/2e81c150/attachment.html>