[NSRCA-discussion] Very quiet on here

[Jon Lowe]

Yeah, but FAI places such emphasis on smoothness and gracefulness, I wonder how automation would handle that!  And EVERYONE would zero snaps, as the wings would never be truly stalled, and the data would prove it!

Jon


-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Kane <getterflash at yahoo.com>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Sat, Aug 17, 2013 8:02 am
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Very quiet on here



Automated judging, here we come . . . . . 

 
Bob Kane
getterflash at yahoo.com


  
 
 
 
   From: James Oddino <joddino at socal.rr.com>
 To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
 Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 5:01 PM
 Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Very quiet on here
  
 



Check this out at the following link.  It might lead to an interesting discussion:




http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1965012#post25863336







On Aug 16, 2013, at 9:27 AM, Jon Lowe wrote:


Very quiet.  Got an email from someone saying he wasn't getting copied, but looking at the archives, the last message posted was from Aug 12th, so I thought I'd test.

Jon
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


 
 
  


_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20130817/fd12a05b/attachment.html>