[NSRCA-discussion] Plettenberg 30-10 evo and Jeti ESC

[Derek Koopowitz]

He’ll tell you that size doesn’t matter!!  LOL

 

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Whodaddy Whodaddy
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 8:08 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Plettenberg 30-10 evo and Jeti ESC

 

Derrick 

 

Don't believe Jon he is always picking on me because mine is bigger than his !!!14 verses a 12.. ;) If it gets to an 18 I don't know what he's going to do...


Gary

 


Sent from my iPhone


On Mar 17, 2012, at 9:56 AM, "Phil S." <chuenkan at comcast.net> wrote:

I certainly didn't mean to start a brand war, I was just sayin'...

On 3/16/2012 4:52 PM, Derek Koopowitz wrote: 

The bottom line is that I have not seen any incompatibility issues with any equipment running on Futaba whether it be older type equipment or newer.  For anyone to suddenly jump on the "cheap shot" wagon is unwarranted just because they think their brand is better. 

 

 

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Jon Lowe <jonlowe at aol.com> wrote:

Chill. Do you work for Futaba? Otherwise, I see no reason for you to "resent" anything.  I did not imply that Jeti was a Futaba product, and I pointed out something that might help make things work.  The fact is, that they apparently have changed from the "standard" that made equipment interoperable.  There are all kinds of things that plug into servo ports, other than servos, that rely on a standard interface (speed controllers, retracts, on board glow systems, switches, etc).

Jon

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Derek Koopowitz <derekkoopowitz at gmail.com>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Fri, Mar 16, 2012 2:49 pm
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Plettenberg 30-10 evo and Jeti ESC

This is NOT a Futaba issue.  I resent the fact that several of you seem to feel that Jeti is a Futaba product and should work perfectly with Futaba equipment.

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Phil S. <chuenkan at comcast.net> wrote:

Jon, how else would they boost their equipment sales?  If the new stuff was backwards compatible (as, BTW, DSMX is with DSM2) everyone would keep using their old, perfectly good stuff instead of replacing it with new...

On 3/16/2012 12:22 PM, Jon Lowe wrote: 

Is this worth a shot?

 

http://www.hobbyking.com/hobbyking/store/uh_viewItem.asp?idProduct=8356

 

It's disappointing that after the various radio manufacturers standardized wiring, signal timing, etc. for servos, that Futaba would move, again, in this direction.  They should make clear in their advertising that their new receivers may not be compatible with equipment you already have.  Should be considered a design defect.  All this does is hurt the customers.

Jon

-- 
Phil Spelt, KCRC President
AMA 1294 Scientific Leader Member
SPA 177 Board Member
(865) 435-1476v, (865) 604-0541c


_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

 

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

 

 
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion






-- 
Phil Spelt, KCRC President
AMA 1294 Scientific Leader Member
SPA 177 Board Member
(865) 435-1476v, (865) 604-0541c

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20120317/871cee19/attachment.html>