[NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposals

[J N Hiller]

You are absolutely right. I introduced a local pilot who flies better than I
to turnaround pattern and at first he found it very challenging.
Flying turnaround pattern is to fly a flight plan consisting of a whole lot
of individual elements that need to be sequenced in a defined order, wind
corrected and properly positioned, 100% of which is judged from box entry to
box exit.
Its great.
Jim H


-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Bob Richards
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:43 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposals

Each individual maneuver is simple - by themselves. Stringing them together
without interruption can be a bit of a shock the first time, standing in
front of judges, with the wind blowing in. I kinda liked the old sportsman
sequence with box breaks every 3 maneuvers. Gave the judges a short break,
too. :-)

Bob R.


--- On Mon, 3/12/12, Peter Vogel <vogel.peter at gmail.com> wrote:

From: Peter Vogel <vogel.peter at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposals
To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Cc: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Date: Monday, March 12, 2012, 6:35 PM
I don't get what the big deal is about turnaround... Who can't execute a
basic reverse cuban, Cuban, or split S at the edge of the box but can
execute consecutive loops at show center?



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20120313/61485af3/attachment.html>