[NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposals

[Del]

AMEN Dave `~ and we were both around to witness most of those changes under the disguise of making it better. 

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Dave Lockhart 
  To: 'General pattern discussion' 
  Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 10:21 AM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposals


  Or continue to muck with the rules, and further drive people away, as has happened every instance in history when the rules were changed.

   

  Regards,

   

  Dave L

   

  From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Dave Burton
  Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 10:57 AM
  To: 'General pattern discussion'
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposals

   

  The real nails are to do nothing and continue on the present declining path IMO.

   

  From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Del
  Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 10:50 AM
  To: General pattern discussion
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposals

   

  it sure is heart warming to see two more nails enter the pattern coffin. 

   

      Del

    ----- Original Message ----- 

    From: Dave Burton 

    To: 'General pattern discussion' 

    Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 9:37 AM

    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposals

     

    So for those of us that see that most of these proposals don’t go far, enough for the most part but all are better than what we have now, lobby Ur AMA officials to pass these proposals ..

    Dave

     

     

    From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Whodaddy Whodaddy
    Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 9:18 AM
    To: General pattern discussion
    Cc: General pattern discussion
    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposals

     

    So for those of us that see there is no clear overwhelming majority for the bulk of this nonsense!!!! lobby Ur AMA officials to defeat these proposals ..

     

    Gary 

    Sent from my iPhone


    On Mar 8, 2012, at 2:50 PM, Scott McHarg <scmcharg at gmail.com> wrote:

      Hello,

         As promised, here are the raw results of the survey.  107 unique individuals took the survey.  Individuals that felt it necessary to vote multiple times had their responses deleted and only their original answers accepted.  Based, in part, to Dean Pappas' post on RCU and through the comments listed there, through email, phone conversation, discussion on this list and in person, the Safety Proposal was adjusted to the "What" instead of the "How".  The new Safety Proposal will be posted shortly on the NSRCA website.  The NSRCA BoD met last night to vote on these candidate proposals.  The original Safety proposal was taken off the table (the one that you saw in the survey) and the new proposal was then voted on.  Based on survey results, District VP interaction with his constituents and posts on RCU as well as this NSRCA discussion list, the BoD unanimously passed the new Safety Proposal, the Class Advancement as well as the Telemetry proposal for submittal to the AMA Rules Committee.  The Weight proposal also passed with a vote of 9 to 1.  

       

         We would like to thank those of you who took the survey and appreciate not only the time that it took for you to fill out the survey, but your dedication to this hobby.  The Rules Proposals will now be sent to the AMA for further review and discussion.  Attached are the survey results both in raw (all members) and NSRCA members only form.  I have also attached all four of the proposals again (with the new Safety Proposal) for your consumption.

       

      Thank you again,

      Scott



      -- 
      Scott A. McHarg

      <Rules Survey.pdf>

      <RC-13 Contestant Advancement.pdf>

      <RC-13 Safety Proposal 2.pdf>

      <RC-13 Telemetry.pdf>

      <RC-13 Weight.pdf>

      _______________________________________________
      NSRCA-discussion mailing list
      NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
      http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20120311/f54556db/attachment.html>