[NSRCA-discussion] Main battery redundant lead for receiver

Keith Hoard khoard at gmail.com
Mon Jan 23 15:54:27 AKST 2012


LOL. . .

Keith Hoard
Collierville, TN
khoard at gmail.com




On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Ronald Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net> wrote:

> He must be a cool dude if he lets you say nice things about him and
> doesn't issue a disclaimer.
>
> Ron
>
> On Jan 23, 2012, at 6:36 PM, Keith Hoard wrote:
>
> Yup, he's a pretty cool dude. . . humble too!!
>
> Keith Hoard
> Collierville, TN
> khoard at gmail.com
>
> Yeah.  And I suspect that Keith knows him really well.
>>
>> BTW, I have used the "low end two cells " with the Hobby King dual
>> switch/regulator (made my own balance connector lead).  Yes, I know that
>> both batteries get used, because both regulators put out 5.9 volts and I
>> have to charge the 2S-850mah "backup" pack regularly, but it still gives me
>> redundancy in the air.
>>
>> Ron
>>
>> On Jan 23, 2012, at 6:13 PM, Keith Hoard wrote:
>>
>> I think some dude may have already posted a thread with pictures on the
>> NSRCA website forums?
>>
>> Keith Hoard
>> Collierville, TN
>> khoard at gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Chris Moon <cjm767driver at hotmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>>  The "low end" pack in a 10S setup is the one with the neg (black) main
>>> power lead going to the ESC input.  This is the pack that you would
>>> consider as "channel 1" on the Cellpro or TP chargers.
>>>
>>> The goal is to power the radio from the motor pack to that voltage
>>> regulator needs to be higher than the regulator used on the back up pack
>>> which can be a 200-350mah 2S pack.  Jim O. came to me with this setup a
>>> while back and as he said has been flying it for some time with success.  I
>>> am working on a schematic or picture to go on the web site to show the
>>> proper hook up of the system.
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> On 1/23/2012 6:56 PM, John Gayer wrote:
>>>
>>> I would like to emphasize that the pigtail from Chris Moon could
>>> physically  be plugged into either of the 5s balance connectors which Jim
>>> identifies as the "bottom" connector. If your esc is not fully optically
>>> isolated on the ground leg and you plug into the "upper" battery, there
>>> will be smoke. If there is a BEC in your ESC, there will NOT be isolation.
>>> In that case, I suggest that you tag or use nail polish to identify the
>>> correct balance connector on each pack as you will be plugging into this
>>> balance connector whenever you change batteries. It is also a good idea to
>>> use a switch for each power lag and check each leg for power separately as
>>> part of your pre-flight process. It is easy to forget plugging in the
>>> balance connector when you start using this system plus it is important to
>>> confirm that both legs are working before each and every flight. Otherwise
>>> you can lose your redundancy before the flight even begins.
>>> The Castle HV series without BEC allows you to use either balance
>>> connector without any issues.
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>> On 1/23/2012 4:25 PM, James Oddino wrote:
>>>
>>> I've been using this setup for sometime and it is working great.  I have
>>> my two cell LiPo charged to 7.5 volts and it is connected to a 6.0 volt
>>> regulator into the receiver.  The cable connected to the balance connector
>>> on the "bottom" 5S is connected to a 6.3 volt regulator so it supplies all
>>> the current to the system and the 2S pack never needs charging.  I'm using
>>> an 800 mAh pack but it could be even smaller.
>>>
>>>  Jim O
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  On Jan 23, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Scott McHarg wrote:
>>>
>>> Guys,
>>>    Chris Moon just e-mailed me about some leads that were done at the
>>> factory.  These leads run off your balance leads to a voltage regulator and
>>> allow your main battery pack to be utilized as a redundant receiver
>>> battery.  It is NOT meant to be a primary but it will save 20+ grams if
>>> you're running 2 rx batteries.  You still have to run the 2nd regulator for
>>> true redundancy but you eliminate the 2nd battery.  These leads are factory
>>> made and eliminate the need to make them yourself with the concern about
>>> plugging in to the wrong cell.  I know in my article, I was pretty much
>>> against doing this as a backup but, with Chris having this made at the
>>> factory, he has all but eliminated making a mistake by tying to the wrong
>>> cell.  I have the link that I'll e-mail you off-list or you can just go to
>>> his website.  I don't want to break the NSRCA list rules by advertising for
>>> him even though he advertises with the NSRCA.  The leads are only $3.99
>>> each and are found under the Connectors/Adapters listing.
>>>
>>> Thank,
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Scott A. McHarg*
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing listNSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.orghttp://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing listNSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.orghttp://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20120124/530f942a/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list