[NSRCA-discussion] 2012 13 AMA rules change proposals

[Dennis Bodary]

Thanks i forgot all about that one.

--- On Tue, 1/3/12, Keith Hoard <khoard at gmail.com> wrote:

From: Keith Hoard <khoard at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2012 13 AMA rules change proposals
To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Date: Tuesday, January 3, 2012, 4:03 PM

I think you'd also need to waive the "no touchy the airplane" rule, also. 

Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 3, 2012, at 12:56, Dennis Bodary <d_bodary at yahoo.com> wrote:


I wanna fly a full size extra in pattern, I can't make the weight or the noise rules much less the 2-meter rule. And i can't fit the pattern in the box. Can we maybe get rid of all those rules just to benefit me? Oh yeah and i am going to need extra money for pilot lessons, hanger fees, fuel etc. etc. Probably going to need longer runways as well. So we should raise everyone elses entry fees to 1,000.00 per contest and of course i would enter free. and i would get 970.00 of everyone's entry fee to help me pay my cost. What do you think Joe?

Think it'll fly? Think it'll fly now that's a funny one.
Happy New Year. Hope everyone had a good holiday. 

--- On Tue, 1/3/12, Joe Lachowski <jlachow at hotmail.com> wrote:


From: Joe Lachowski <jlachow at hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2012 13 AMA rules change proposals

To: "NSRCA Discussion List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Date: Tuesday, January 3, 2012, 1:38 PM





Boy , not having any rules proposals would be a first. Yeah right. Fat chance<g>
 


> From: jnhiller at earthlink.net
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org

> Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 09:43:23 -0800
> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] 2012 13 AMA rules change proposals
> 
> It may be about time for rules change proposals to be considered. The AMA
> deadline is March 15 2012.

> Is an NSRCA survey being planned?
> Maybe we don't need any changes this cycle!
> Jim Hiller
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org

> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
 		 	   		  

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org

http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20120104/8af0364c/attachment.html>