[NSRCA-discussion] Safety Proposal

[Keith Hoard]

I think that 5500 Kg, Pb batteries would be viable . . .


Keith Hoard
Collierville, TN
khoard at gmail.com 


From: w d 
Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2012 1:13 PM
To: General pattern discussion 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Safety Proposal

I hope the weight issue was defeated. other wise im going to half to go buy some 6k or 8k batteries and an imac size electric motor to put in my plane so I can be the first to bastardize the the new weight rule...

Gary


On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Scott McHarg <scmcharg at gmail.com> wrote:

  As the survey continues, I would like to take this moment to reassure everyone that we are listening and have heard what you're saying. 

  We are currently in the process of removing the "HOW" and continuing with the "WHAT".  We can thank Dean Pappas for this.  As soon as we have it finalized as to what we'd like to propose, we will submit it to y'all.  In other words, the requirement of the arming plug is being removed.  We started on a revision Friday and should have it completed the first part of this week.

  Now, please smile and go fly and continue to plan your trip for the NATS in 2013.

  -- 
  Scott A. McHarg


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20120219/ff518858/attachment.html>