[NSRCA-discussion] Proposals Survey

Sat Feb 18 05:59:04 AKST 2012

the scatch and sniff kind

From: khoard at gmail.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 08:48:47 -0600
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposals Survey

Hmmmm, maybe there is a market in the pattern community for Carbon Fiber panties. . . with 1/4” endgrain balsa reinforcements to prevent “wadding”? . . . 
.
I SMELL MONEY!!!!

Keith Hoard
Collierville, TN
khoard at gmail.com 

From: Phil S. 
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2012 7:15 AM
To: General pattern discussion 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposals Survey

I'll second that one, Keith, from one Volunteer to another...lol

On 2/17/2012 11:52 PM, Keith Hoard wrote: 

Geeze, now I have to come up with another rules proposal:

  A pattern competitor’s “panties” must be in the Full and Extended position from the time his aircraft enters the ready box, until the caller retrieves his airplane after an official flight.  If a competitors panties become “wadded” during a flight, the judges will immediately direct the pilot to land his airplane and all maneuvers following the “wadding” will be scored Zero.

Keith Hoard
Collierville, TN
khoard at gmail.com 

From: Scott McHarg 
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 9:25 PM
To: General pattern discussion 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposals Survey

Hi Dan,
   It just makes more work for me (which I'm sure Keith H. would enjoy greatly as he seems to have his panties in a wad).  We have several filters in place so I'll just filter out the duplicate entries.  We will know who is trying to "pad the results".  There were several folks that were having trouble accessing the system so we had to remove the one time per user.  Either way, only the initial entry will be taken and if a bunch go in just to screw it up for everyone, we'll just shut it down.  You're right, it makes it a bit useless when people do that.

Have a good weekend,
Scott

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Dan Curtis <warrior523 at att.net> wrote:

Guys,

When the survey was put up on the website I filled it out and submitted my answers.  Then I could not get back in to the survey.  Which I assume was to stop a person from voting more than once.  Well, I was on the website earlier tonight and for the heck of it I hit the survey link and low and behold I was back in and was able to fill the survey out again.  If I hit submit, I get the results sumitted message.  It appears that a person can vote as many times as they see fit now.  I had another person or two try the same thing with the same results.  Is this feature okay or is it making the survey results a bit useless?

It may still be only countng the first time you voted or submitted but that is not the way it appears.  Anybody got an answer???

Dan
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-- 
Scott A. McHarg

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-- 
Phil Spelt, KCRC President
AMA 1294 Scientific Leader Member
SPA 177 Board Member
(865) 435-1476v, (865) 604-0541c

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20120218/87ac669f/attachment.html>