[NSRCA-discussion] Proposals Survey

[Dan Curtis]

Okay, that is it!  I asked because I want to know, I have served on the board 
for several years prior and we were asked to prove darn near everything we did, 
including surveys.  So if you want to attack with a C'mon Man so be it.  From 
the views you expressed on RCU we know how you stand on the main issue of 
weight, from the minutes of the meetings for this year we know that you were 
able to select "volonteers" to complete your committee, we know that the 
preamble was written in a way to present the board as being for the proposed 
changes, so we know that some seem to have an agenda.  You asked for it so you 
got it.  So it would appear that we have no real verifiable way of supporting 
survey results one way or the other.

I seldom post on this forum, since it usually just banter between old friends 
and foes and full of insider jokes but these so called proposals are things that 
should be discussed on this forum.  They should have been discussed prior to 
being placed in any type of survey.  They affect our sport and I believe your 
survey will show that they would effect it adversely.  We have been through all 
of this before, over and over on weight.  It seems like a resurecting ghost that 
we can't keep underground.  

The fact that you seem so defensive of your baby also adds to my doubt about 
this whole fiasco.  Now, lay off  the attacks and either answer the questions or 
ingnore them, your choice Mr. Chairman.

Dan




________________________________
From: Scott McHarg <scmcharg at gmail.com>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Fri, February 17, 2012 9:34:22 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposals Survey

Dan,
  It was actually 16 times you voted including your original.  I've taken care 
of the extras for you.  As far as factual, really?  Do you honestly think that 
way?  They will be factual because we are here to serve you.  If the majority 
says they don't like something, what would be the purpose of doing it?  If we 
wanted to push our own agendas, why even have a survey? C'mon Man!


On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Dan Curtis <warrior523 at att.net> wrote:

Well, lets hope that is true, I only voted about 15 times so not a problem.
>
>One other question, how will we know the results are factual?  
>
>Dan
>
>
>
>
________________________________
From: Scott McHarg <scmcharg at gmail.com>
>To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>Sent: Fri, February 17, 2012 9:25:53 PM
>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposals Survey
>
>
>Hi Dan,
>   It just makes more work for me (which I'm sure Keith H. would enjoy greatly 
>as he seems to have his panties in a wad).  We have several filters in place so 
>I'll just filter out the duplicate entries.  We will know who is trying to "pad 
>the results".  There were several folks that were having trouble accessing the 
>system so we had to remove the one time per user.  Either way, only the initial 
>entry will be taken and if a bunch go in just to screw it up for everyone, we'll 
>just shut it down.  You're right, it makes it a bit useless when people do that.
>
>Have a good weekend,
>Scott
>
>
>On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Dan Curtis <warrior523 at att.net> wrote:
>
>Guys,
>>
>>When the survey was put up on the website I filled it out and submitted my 
>>answers.  Then I could not get back in to the survey.  Which I assume was to 
>>stop a person from voting more than once.  Well, I was on the website earlier 
>>tonight and for the heck of it I hit the survey link and low and behold I was 
>>back in and was able to fill the survey out again.  If I hit submit, I get the 
>>results sumitted message.  It appears that a person can vote as many times as 
>>they see fit now.  I had another person or two try the same thing with the same 
>>results.  Is this feature okay or is it making the survey results a bit useless?
>>
>>It may still be only countng the first time you voted or submitted but that is 
>>not the way it appears.  Anybody got an answer???
>>
>>Dan
>>_______________________________________________
>>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>
>
>-- 
>Scott A. McHarg
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>


-- 
Scott A. McHarg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20120218/b10375a8/attachment.html>