[NSRCA-discussion] bullets

[Jerry Stebbins]

Ron, when you get back in town-away from all the painfull circumstances, let me know if you have a dozen of the 4's you talked about. I will also need batteries/servos/esc's/connectors (Deans)--just got to figure out what!
Jerry 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ronald Van Putte 
  To: General pattern discussion 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 9:36 AM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] bullets


  Some, but not all sizes. 


  Ron


  On Mar 30, 2011, at 9:28 AM, Jerry Stebbins wrote:


    Ron, do you have these in stock?
    Jerry
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Ronald Van Putte 
      To: General pattern discussion 
      Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 7:05 AM
      Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] bullets


      I have gotten these "no bulge/slotted design" connectors from two sources:  HobbyKing and BidProduct.  You have to look at the pictures carefully to see that they are the "no bulge/slotted design".   


      I really like BidProduct for acquiring large quantities of the smaller items, like connectors, extensions and hardware for my small hobby shop.  Many items can be purchased with free shipping. 


      Ron


      On Mar 30, 2011, at 4:09 AM, Houdini76 at aol.com wrote:


        Ron, what brand of connectors has the no bulge/slotted design?  Do you use 4, 5 or 6mm?

        Rob


        In a message dated 3/29/2011 8:01:08 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, vanputte at cox.net writes:
          Good stuff Verne.   


          I have noticed the difference in bullet connector design.  I used to buy 3.5mm bullet connectors which had a "bulge" in the center of the male part.  Recently, I noticed some 3.5mm bullet connectors which had no "bulge" in the male part.  They push into the female part because there's a chamfer on the tip of the male part, which compresses the slotted male connector so it will fit into the female part.  The big advantage of this design is that virtually all of the connector is mated with the other half, unlike the ones with a "bulge", which have significantly reduced contact area.  Then I noticed that you can buy this same design in 4mm, 5mm and 6mm bullet connectors.  My opinion - these are far superior.


          Ron


          On Mar 29, 2011, at 6:30 PM, Verne Koester wrote:


            Jerry,

            I started out with Deans Ultra’s. They worked fine but didn’t wear too well. The arc from connecting them together was really chewing them up. Then I switched to 5.5mm bullets. Those worked great and the arc did damage where it didn’t matter. The problem I discovered later was when I needed some more. Not all 5.5mm are created equal and I ran into some serious fit problems from one batch to the next. I noticed that most of the Europeans were using 4mm bullets. These are made a little different than the 5.5mm and have more “spring” in them so the tolerances don’t have to be so close. Like the 5.5mm bullets, the arc damage happens on the very tip which is not part of the actual electrical connection. I’ve been very happy with the 4mm bullets and will be starting my third season with them. BTW, I never noticed any power changes from the Deans to the 5.5’s to the 4’s. Hope this helps.


            Verne Koester


            From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Jerry Stebbins
            Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 5:29 PM
            To: Discussion -NSRCA
            Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] bullets


            All E's. What size bullets have you settled on for your packs/ESC connections? Seems like something that would sorta get standardized after a lot of 70A usage. I have heard from 3.5 to 6.0. Would think it would work itself out to support the nominal max. I that most see. I am sure 3D needs all they can get but for AMA/FAI patterns seems like it otta round off pretty close for most using 5s packs.

            Thanks ahead

            Jerry 

            _______________________________________________
            NSRCA-discussion mailing list
            NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
            http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


          =

          _______________________________________________
          NSRCA-discussion mailing list
          NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
          http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
        _______________________________________________
        NSRCA-discussion mailing list
        NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
        http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion





--------------------------------------------------------------------------



      _______________________________________________
      NSRCA-discussion mailing list
      NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
      http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20110330/5dd25c05/attachment.html>