[NSRCA-discussion] bullets
Jerry Stebbins
JAStebbins at att.net
Wed Mar 30 06:28:52 AKDT 2011
Ron, do you have these in stock?
Jerry
----- Original Message -----
From: Ronald Van Putte
To: General pattern discussion
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 7:05 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] bullets
I have gotten these "no bulge/slotted design" connectors from two sources: HobbyKing and BidProduct. You have to look at the pictures carefully to see that they are the "no bulge/slotted design".
I really like BidProduct for acquiring large quantities of the smaller items, like connectors, extensions and hardware for my small hobby shop. Many items can be purchased with free shipping.
Ron
On Mar 30, 2011, at 4:09 AM, Houdini76 at aol.com wrote:
Ron, what brand of connectors has the no bulge/slotted design? Do you use 4, 5 or 6mm?
Rob
In a message dated 3/29/2011 8:01:08 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, vanputte at cox.net writes:
Good stuff Verne.
I have noticed the difference in bullet connector design. I used to buy 3.5mm bullet connectors which had a "bulge" in the center of the male part. Recently, I noticed some 3.5mm bullet connectors which had no "bulge" in the male part. They push into the female part because there's a chamfer on the tip of the male part, which compresses the slotted male connector so it will fit into the female part. The big advantage of this design is that virtually all of the connector is mated with the other half, unlike the ones with a "bulge", which have significantly reduced contact area. Then I noticed that you can buy this same design in 4mm, 5mm and 6mm bullet connectors. My opinion - these are far superior.
Ron
On Mar 29, 2011, at 6:30 PM, Verne Koester wrote:
Jerry,
I started out with Deans Ultra’s. They worked fine but didn’t wear too well. The arc from connecting them together was really chewing them up. Then I switched to 5.5mm bullets. Those worked great and the arc did damage where it didn’t matter. The problem I discovered later was when I needed some more. Not all 5.5mm are created equal and I ran into some serious fit problems from one batch to the next. I noticed that most of the Europeans were using 4mm bullets. These are made a little different than the 5.5mm and have more “spring” in them so the tolerances don’t have to be so close. Like the 5.5mm bullets, the arc damage happens on the very tip which is not part of the actual electrical connection. I’ve been very happy with the 4mm bullets and will be starting my third season with them. BTW, I never noticed any power changes from the Deans to the 5.5’s to the 4’s. Hope this helps.
Verne Koester
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Jerry Stebbins
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 5:29 PM
To: Discussion -NSRCA
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] bullets
All E's. What size bullets have you settled on for your packs/ESC connections? Seems like something that would sorta get standardized after a lot of 70A usage. I have heard from 3.5 to 6.0. Would think it would work itself out to support the nominal max. I that most see. I am sure 3D needs all they can get but for AMA/FAI patterns seems like it otta round off pretty close for most using 5s packs.
Thanks ahead
Jerry
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
=
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20110330/710a45f3/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list