[NSRCA-discussion] Contest Results

Michael S. Harrison drmikedds at sbcglobal.net
Tue Jun 7 10:40:50 AKDT 2011


Thanks to everyone that worked on this contest.  It was an excellent, well run event.  It is a beautiful site and a great place to fly.  Thanks to all.

Mike 

 

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of RCJudge
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2011 3:51 PM
To: 'General pattern discussion'
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Contest Results

 

Results for the Jetero Pattern Shootout, Huffman, Tx  is available on 

 

http://pages.suddenlink.net/donramsey

 

dr

 

 

 

 

 

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Vicente "Vince" Bortone
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 9:51 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] A question for the experts

 

Matt,

 

Also the stall turn lines has to be equal in length (unless is a turnaround).  Therefore, the only way to do it is by having the height of the middle loop at the same altitude of the entrance and exit lines because all loop elements has to have equal radius.  In conclusion, using the individual description of the maneuver we can conclude that the height of the all loop elements in the figure M has to be the same.

 

Thanks,  

Vicente "Vince" Bortone

----- Original Message -----
From: rcmaster199 at aol.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 9:02:27 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] A question for the experts

I too have an issue to bring out on the M....... specifically the F3A M

 

A question, or closer to a statement actually, was posed to me at the recent contest regardng the height of the middle looping element.....that it did not have to have the same height as the entry/exit looping elements; that it specifically was not written anywhere so it didn't exist.

 

My response is that the geometry must be preserved. As long as I've flown pattern, this maneuver's geometry always required the looping elements to be at the same height. The way I see it, if looping element heights are to be different, we should see some verbiage to that effect in maneuver description

 

I don't have the maneuver description handy so if someone would please post it, I'd appreciate it

 

regards

 

MattK

 

-----Original Message-----
From: tocdon <tocdon at netscape.net>
To: nsrca-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Thu, May 26, 2011 11:34 pm
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] A question for the experts

A question for the judging experts.

 

Figure M, both Masters and FAI- Yes I know the bottom line rule the best presentation gets the best score, but a technical question.

 

Maneuver flow  in a crosswind.  Plane starts maneuver at 140 meters distance out.  During the first stall turn the plane drifts out (recall this is a stalled maneuver); second stall turn the plane drifts out again (same).  Now the plane wind corrects in all other aspects of the maneuver but exits approximately 20 meters further out than the entry and no defects observed, but exit distance is 160 meters.  What is the score given for this maneuver?


Best Regards,

 

Don

_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20110607/61add911/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list