[NSRCA-discussion] The NATS schedule has been published on the NSRCA website

Archie Stafford astafford at md.metrocast.net
Fri Jul 22 05:26:02 AKDT 2011


Tim

Since it is split over two sites its only 48 flights on each site with two lines running. So only 24 on each flight line. Still very tight but manageable. 

Arch

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 22, 2011, at 9:15 AM, Tim Taylor <timsautopro at yahoo.com> wrote:

> I don't have a dog in this hunt but with 48 Master Pilots and 34 FAI pilots the Schedule seems to be self evident.
>  
> Will be interesting to see 96 rounds blown in 4 hrs.
>  
> Tim
>  
> --- On Fri, 7/22/11, mike mueller <mups1953 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> From: mike mueller <mups1953 at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] The NATS schedule has been published on the NSRCA website
> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Date: Friday, July 22, 2011, 8:49 AM
> 
>  Masters should take 4 hours to complete 2 rounds each day.
> 
> From: Phil S. <chuenkan at comcast.net>
> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 7:43 AM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] The NATS schedule has been published on the NSRCA website
> If Masters plus FAI together are too long for  one daylight period, does it really matter which one goes first???  They won't fit either way... On 7/21/2011 2:36 PM, Tim Taylor wrote:
>> 
>> If Masters goes to 3pm will they then start FAI? 
>>  
>> Will they stop Masters to start FAI at noon? 
>>  
>> If they do when will they fly the missing flights?
>>  
>> If FAI finished at 11am could Masters start then?
>>  
>> Wouldn't the Numbers dictate that Masters flies in the afternoon?
>>  
>>  
>> Just askin...........
>>  
>>  
>> Tim --- On Thu, 7/21/11, Jon Lowe <jonlowe at aol.com> wrote:
>> 
>> From: Jon Lowe <jonlowe at aol.com>
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] The NATS schedule has been published on the NSRCA website
>> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> Date: Thursday, July 21, 2011, 8:56 AM
>> 
>> Frankly, I like the idea of Masters finishing earlier in the day for a change.  If we run long, they will have to wait.  And we are talking about 8 people for the unknown meeting, correct?  This isn't a team selection year so there is no need to expand the number of finalists.
>> Jon
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message----- From: Ronald Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> Sent: Thu, Jul 21, 2011 7:47 am Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] The NATS schedule has been published on the NSRCA website
>> Nope.
>> Ron
>> On Jul 21, 2011, at 6:44 AM, Tim Taylor wrote:
>>> No reason it can't be changed is there?
>>>  
>>> Tim --- On Wed, 7/20/11, Ronald Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> From: Ronald Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net>
>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] The NATS schedule has been published on the NSRCA website
>>> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>> Date: Wednesday, July 20, 2011, 7:58 PM
>>> 
>>> Based on the Master class entry list and the fact that the Master class is flying in the morning, we should use up virtually every minute from 8:00 A.M. to noon, assuming 10 minutes per flight and very short judge potty breaks.  I hope there's no rain delays.
>>> Ron Van Putte
>>> On Jul 20, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Derek Koopowitz wrote:
>>>> Thanks to Rusty for sending me the information.  Some locations/times may change for the judging certification... stay tuned!
>>>> http://www.nsrca.us
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>> 
>>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing listNSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.orghttp://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> =
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> 
>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing listNSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.orghttp://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> -- 
> Phil Spelt, KCRC President
> AMA 1294 Scientific Leader Member
> SPA 177 Board Member
> (865) 435-1476v, (865) 604-0541c
> _______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing listNSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.orghttp://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20110722/cf38ae55/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list