[NSRCA-discussion] quiet

[Scott Smith]

Agreed that option C would fit the rule.  I was hung up on 

 

Each maneuver is to be scored individually on a basis of 10 to zero (0) points, in half point increments

 

 

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Jon Lowe
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 6:08 PM
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] quiet

 

Option c.  The average of 8 and 8.5 is 8.25.  No problem since scores are normalized and Kfactors are present anyway.

Jon

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Smith <js.smith at verizon.net>
To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Fri, Dec 30, 2011 5:04 pm
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] quiet

Since it’s so quiet…

 

When a judge fails to fully observe the maneuver in progress that maneuver score must be a “NO” for “Not Observed”.  That judge’s score will then be given the average of the scores of the other judge’s scores when more than 2 judges are present or the score of the other judge when there are only 2 judges.

 

So 3 judges record: NO, 8.5, 8.0

 

What does NO get changed to?  8 or 8.5?

 

From:  <mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [ <mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org?> mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Keith Hoard
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 2:57 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] quiet

 

Working in the garage building a new shop.  Kinda nice to start over from scratch once in a while. . .

Temps in the low 60's today, kinda windy.

Keith Hoard
Collierville, TN
 <mailto:khoard at gmail.com> khoard at gmail.com




On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Gordon Seeling < <mailto:gseeling at q.com> gseeling at q.com> wrote:

any one home???
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
 <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
 <http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

 

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
 <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
 <http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20111230/c1df25f5/attachment.html>