[NSRCA-discussion] Height of manuevers
Phil Spelt
chuenkan at comcast.net
Wed Sep 8 17:11:54 AKDT 2010
I thought the 400' limit was within a certain distance (can't
remember how near) from an active airport. Do I not remember correctly???
At 20:55 2010/09/08, you wrote:
>If a 400ft limit ever becomes reality we'll all be flying foamies!
>
>Earl
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <mailto:johnfuqua at embarqmail.com>John Fuqua
>To: <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>'General pattern discussion'
>Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 7:50 PM
>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Height of manuevers
>
>Sort of blows the 400 ft AMA "limit" out of the water. 700 - 900'
>AGL seems pretty normal on my Eagletree altimeter.
>
>
>
>From:
><mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
>[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Derek Koopowitz
>Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 6:10 PM
>To: General pattern discussion
>Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Height of manuevers
>
>
>
>Has anyone done any testing using a altimeter of sorts such as
>Eagletree's altimeter option to figure out exactly how high some of
>our maneuvers end up? In using basic Trigonometry I can estimate
>that if a plane is flown at 150 meters at a 60 degree angle then the
>plane should be around 260m (around 800') high... do we fly higher
>than this? Obviously the further out one flies then the higher one
>gets if at 60 degrees.
>
>
>
>Are there any true measurements that one could relay to me... or if
>someone has an altimeter, could you test it out and let me know
>please? I'm particularly interested in current
>sequences/maneuvers... especially F3A or Masters. I don't think the
>lower classes get to an altitude that is of any significance
>(generally speaking of course).
>
>
>----------
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-->There are only two types of aircraft -- fighters and targets.
Phil Spelt, Past President, Knox County Radio Control Society, Inc.
URL: http://www.kcrctn.com
AMA--1294, Scientific Leader Member SPA--177, Board Member
My URL: http://mywebpages.comcast.net/~chuenkan/
(865) 435-1476 v (865) 604-0541 c
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20100909/4365a752/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list