[NSRCA-discussion] Height of manuevers

Phil Spelt chuenkan at comcast.net
Wed Sep 8 17:11:54 AKDT 2010


I thought the 400' limit was within a certain distance (can't 
remember how near) from an active airport.  Do I not remember correctly???

At 20:55 2010/09/08, you wrote:
>If a 400ft limit ever becomes reality we'll all be flying foamies!
>
>Earl
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <mailto:johnfuqua at embarqmail.com>John Fuqua
>To: <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>'General pattern discussion'
>Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 7:50 PM
>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Height of manuevers
>
>Sort of blows the 400 ft AMA "limit" out of the water.   700 - 900' 
>AGL seems pretty normal on my Eagletree altimeter.
>
>
>
>From: 
><mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org 
>[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Derek Koopowitz
>Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 6:10 PM
>To: General pattern discussion
>Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Height of manuevers
>
>
>
>Has anyone done any testing using a altimeter of sorts such as 
>Eagletree's altimeter option to figure out exactly how high some of 
>our maneuvers end up?  In using basic Trigonometry I can estimate 
>that if a plane is flown at 150 meters at a 60 degree angle then the 
>plane should be around 260m (around 800') high... do we fly higher 
>than this?  Obviously the further out one flies then the higher one 
>gets if at 60 degrees.
>
>
>
>Are there any true measurements that one could relay to me... or if 
>someone has an altimeter, could you test it out and let me know 
>please?  I'm particularly interested in current 
>sequences/maneuvers... especially F3A or Masters.  I don't think the 
>lower classes get to an altitude that is of any significance 
>(generally speaking of course).
>
>
>----------
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-->There are only two types of aircraft -- fighters and targets.

Phil Spelt, Past President, Knox County Radio Control Society, Inc.
        URL: http://www.kcrctn.com
AMA--1294,  Scientific Leader Member  SPA--177, Board Member
       My URL: http://mywebpages.comcast.net/~chuenkan/
       (865) 435-1476 v  (865) 604-0541 c  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20100909/4365a752/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list