[NSRCA-discussion] Acceptable use policy for the list...

[Derek Koopowitz]

Let's be very clear here... this was not aimed at Tony in particular, and
also just to clarify something - Radio South is no longer advertising in the
K-Factor since their core business is no longer pattern pilots.  He decided
a month ago to stop advertising and you'll notice that their ad is no longer
in the latest issue.

There have been several instances over the past number of months where one
or two hobby shops have posted for sale items on this list.  We had a big
brouhaha a number of years ago when a hobby shop owner started posted for
sale items on the list, and as another poster correctly alluded to - there
are other small competitors that have voiced their concerns over the
inequity of them abiding by the rules and others not doing so.

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Dave Burton <burtona at atmc.net> wrote:

>  He’s also a K-Factor advertiser. Don’t get him PO’ed  over nothing!
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:
> nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] *On Behalf Of *
> ldiamond at diamondrc.com
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 06, 2010 4:07 PM
> *To:* General pattern discussion
>
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Acceptable use policy for the list...
>
>
>
> There is a balance.
>
>
>
> I didn't see Tony's post as an advertisement. I would be ok with any
> Pattern Supplier putting out an advisory for specific items such as the, I
> won't carry anymore, tough for some to get...type of items...
>
>
>
> Radio South is very good to the pattern community. We should not forget
> that...
>
>
>
> If Tony posted a laundry list of sale items, I would see a conflict and
> problem. This isn't the case here...
>
>
>
> Larry
>
> --- On *Wed, 10/6/10, mike mueller <mups1953 at yahoo.com>* wrote:
>
>
> From: mike mueller <mups1953 at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Acceptable use policy for the list...
> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Date: Wednesday, October 6, 2010, 2:11 PM
>
>  I'm sure some see it as a small deal but if you are a competitor and
> attempting to abide by the rules you may have a completly different
> perspective. For that reason I think the rules in place are well thought out
> and I think Derek is correct in pointing it out. MIke
>
> --- On *Wed, 10/6/10, Keith Hoard <khoard at gmail.com>* wrote:
>
>
> From: Keith Hoard <khoard at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Acceptable use policy for the list...
> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Date: Wednesday, October 6, 2010, 12:49 PM
>
> I'll second that!!!
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Oct 6, 2010, at 12:03, "GEORGE KENNIE" <geobet4 at verizon.net<http://us.mc510.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=geobet4@verizon.net>>
> wrote:
>
>  I think this was meant as an advisory.
>
>
>
> I don't think you'd want to call him in January only to find out that they
> were no longer an
>
> available item when you had expected them to be.
>
>
>
> I have always found his updates to be useful information and his use of our
> site to be discreet !
>
>
>
> As he is not the only purveyor amoungst our group to utilize the site for a
> heads up and certainly
>
> not abusing the privelidge, it would seem to me that these types of
> advisories should be allowed
>
> without recriminations.
>
>
>
> I think a discretionary reaction should prevail.
>
>
>
> G.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>
> *From:* Derek Koopowitz<http://us.mc510.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=derekkoopowitz@gmail.com>
>
> *To:* NSRCA List<http://us.mc510.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org>
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 06, 2010 9:51 AM
>
> *Subject:* [NSRCA-discussion] Acceptable use policy for the list...
>
>
>
> I’d just like to point out a reminder for everyone about the list’s
> acceptable use policy… please see:
>
>
>
>  http://nsrca.us/mailinglist/joinlist.html
>  ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<http://us.mc510.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>  _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<http://us.mc510.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<http://us.mc510.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<http://us.mc533.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>    ------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1120 / Virus Database: 422/3180 - Release Date: 10/06/10
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20101006/03905075/attachment.html>