[NSRCA-discussion] Answered - Pulse Width for 'center' on JRradios

Ed Alt ed_alt at hotmail.com
Fri Nov 19 15:03:26 AKST 2010


jeez.  It’s microseconds, (μs), not ms.  

From: Ed Alt 
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 6:27 PM
To: General pattern discussion 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Answered - Pulse Width for 'center' on JRradios

Jim:
On a JR X9303 2.4, with full channel range enabled, it goes from 917ms to 2075ms.

Ed

From: James Oddino 
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 12:39 PM
To: General pattern discussion 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Answered - Pulse Width for 'center' on JRradios

What was the answer?  Close enough? 

What is the total range on each system? I believe the Futaba is .9 to 2.1.  

Jim



On Nov 17, 2010, at 11:06 AM, atwooddon at aol.com wrote:


  I finally found the info on RC Groups so please ignore the request.

  thanks
  Don

  In a message dated 11/17/2010 9:43:56 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, AtwoodDon at aol.com writes:
    Is the 'center' pulse width on JR radios the same as Futaba?  1.5ms?

    I can't seem to find this info online anywhere.  I am installing radio gear in a plane for a friend using JR equipment and I want to make sure center is the same on my Futabas when I set all the surfaces to center.

    thanks
    Don


    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20101120/800e1f02/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list