[NSRCA-discussion] Hitec Aurora 9

[Jay Marshall]

I totally agree. It looks like that we are going to have to approach the
whole telemetry issue and its ramifications. It would seem that any type of
data sent from the aircraft should be OK as long as it is not in the control
loop. Much of the data, such as altitude and speed for example, is already
provided in rough form by the pilot's observation. Telemetry just provides a
more accurate value.

Jay Marshall

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of
rclen123 at roadrunner.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 11:47 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Hitec Aurora 9


---- Joe Dunnaway <dunnaway at hbcomm.net> wrote: 
>     One of our club members showed up at the field the other day with a 
> new Hitec Aurora 9.  The interesting feature of this radio is telemetry 
> back from the receiver showing voltage of the airborne receiver battery 
> with a programmable low battery alarm on the transmitter.  I think this 
> is something we have needed for a long time but It looks like our rule 
> book prohibits any type of electronic signal or feedback from the model.  
>     Do we need to change this rule or propose some type of exception to 
> allow this kind of data to be used? 
> 
> Thanks
> Joe Dunnaway
> 
> _Hey Joe:  Don't know about the rule but how in heck are you doing.  Lynn
Burks____________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion