[NSRCA-discussion] curious

Jay Marshall lightfoot at sc.rr.com
Mon Mar 22 11:54:59 AKDT 2010


Vince, now you are really going to mess their minds up! In addition, at my
age, all natural responses are heavily dampened! lol

 

Jay Marshall 

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Vicente
"Vince" Bortone
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 1:58 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] curious

 

This is very good point.  There is another important factor that I am going
to try to explain.  Someone expert in controls can help us here.  I think
that is called natural frequency of the control system.  If the the human
natural frequency is close to the TX/RX combo that will be a huge problem
since the  control system won't be stable.  In other worlds if the TX/RX
latency is very small but the natural frequencies are close to each other it
could be very bad results.  Well, I think this is very difficult to measure
but I think this additional factor should be of consideration. 

Vicente "Vince" Bortone

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill's Email" <wemodels at cox.net>
To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 10:07:47 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] curious

I think it's amusing that a year or so ago nobody had ever even heard of 
latency. Now it is THE NUMBER ONE technical specification to consider.

Keep in mind that radio latency is one to two orders of magnitude less 
than the "human" latency (reaction time) that we must all deal with. 
That runs about 215 milliseconds on average.

Test yours:  http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime/index.php




_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20100322/0b115ff0/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list