[NSRCA-discussion] Max volts

[Jay Marshall]

When you make-brake-make-break., then it is AC.

 

Jay Marshall 

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Bill Glaze
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 2:34 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Max volts

 

Seems to me I recall an ignition coil works on DC--but it doesn't work until
the primary circuit is broken, I believe.

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Jay Marshall <mailto:lightfoot at sc.rr.com>  

To: 'General pattern discussion' <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>  

Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 2:10 PM

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Max volts

 

I once was told that DC wouldn't go through a transformer so I got a 100:1
transformer and told the person to "hold these wires" and then connected a
battery to it.

His mind is still messed up...

 

Jay Marshall 

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Bob Richards
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 2:00 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Max volts

 


But everyone knows it is current, not voltage, that kills. :-)

 

(I am just joking, BTW.)

 

Bob R.

--- On Mon, 3/1/10, Atwood, Mark <atwoodm at paragon-inc.com> wrote:

 

Biggest problem with raising the voltage is that 40v is generally considered
the max non lethal voltage.    You'll be hard pressed to get a voltage
increase for general safety reasons. 

I'm sure that's why the current limitation  is in the general guidelines in
the first place. 
--------------------------

 


  _____  


_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20100301/6829f812/attachment.html>