[NSRCA-discussion] Voltage Regulators re-visit

[Richard Strickland]

OK, when a manufacturer does NOT give a 6V value for certain servos--are they saying actually no or not recommended to a regulated 6V or to a fully charged 5 cell nicad pack(and its higher voltage)?

 

Richard
 


From: joddino at socal.rr.com
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 10:02:33 -0700
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Voltage Regulators re-visit

Richard, Robert and Mike,


The reason for the 5.1 volt value was to replicate a fully charged four cell NiCd pack.  That was the highest recommended for some servos like the Futaba 9402.  The 5.7 volt value was the highest value one could regulate to with a five cell pack that was discharged to 5.9 volts.  When the Lithium cells came out we went to 6.0 volts to get the highest safe operating voltage and the lowest heat dissipation as stated.  I'm guessing one could go higher than 6.0 if he was very careful not to load the servo too much for too long but why take a chance with $100 plus servos.


By the way, for all you folks running without regulators, only add one if you want to improve your flying.  


Jim





On Jun 1, 2010, at 8:06 AM, Richard Strickland wrote:

What output voltage are most running for 2S lipos--particularly for Futaba?  I'm fairly sure the ones I've got are around 5.6.
 
Thanks,
 
Richard



The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with Hotmail. Get busy. _______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20100601/7aa9545e/attachment.html>