[NSRCA-discussion] S.bus

[Richard Strickland]

WTR-7  Got one for when the grandkids come to visit.  Works great--let them get in deeper and deeper until I took over--felt like a wire.. Used a 7 channel FASST with my MZ and also made an adapter for my WC2 which seems to work--but not flown yet.  I think Tony's going to do an article on it.  It is in effect a tiny receiver that is bound to the student's transmitter and is plugged in to the trainer jack in the back of the instructor's. I also understand some are using it for plugging into sims with an aux battery pack.

RS 
 


From: johnfuqua at embarqmail.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 15:10:59 -0500
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus





Actually I think Futaba now has a wireless buddy box available.
 


From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Atwood, Mark
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 12:23 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
 
I’ve been saying that for years…if only we could have wireless power we’d be there.   
 
I’d also like to see Bluetooth Buddy Box systems.
 

Mark Atwood
Paragon Consulting, Inc.  |  President
5885 Landerbrook Drive Suite 130, Cleveland Ohio, 44124 
Phone: 440.684.3101 x102  |  Fax: 440.684.3102
mark.atwood at paragon-inc.com  |  www.paragon-inc.com
 


From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of John Fuqua
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 12:06 PM
To: 'General pattern discussion'
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
 
What would be really cool is a system with wireless servos.   Sort of a mini Wi-Fi hotspot.  Now that would be really  useful.   
 

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Jon Lowe
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 10:09 AM
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
 
There is a great article on latency here: 

 

http://www.rcmodelreviews.com/what_is_latency.shtml

 

A lot of people are hung up on transmitter/receiver latency numbers, and don't see the whole picture.  This gives as good a fact based write up as any I've seen.

Jon Lowe
 

-----Original Message-----
From: John Fuqua <johnfuqua at embarqmail.com>
To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Fri, Jul 9, 2010 8:48 am
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
How fast is anyone able to practically see a faster "command repetitionrate" anyway and relate it to some surface movement???   We are all ready atinstantaneous -----Original Message-----From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ed AltSent: Friday, July 09, 2010 8:03 AMTo: General pattern discussionSubject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus Not only could the command repetition rate be increased, but you now have a comms bus that will support duplex communication.  This is a great way to add telemetry devices. Ed --------------------------------------------------From: "James Oddino" <joddino at socal.rr.com>Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 1:26 AMTo: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus > I was thinking that maybe now without the pulse width interface, they > could have three times the rep rate with a digital interface, but who > knows.  There was a time when I knew what was going on inside RC systems > so I could decide what was best.  Futaba doesn't seem to care, or maybe > the marketing guys don't know what is important.> > Jim> > > On Jul 8, 2010, at 8:10 PM, Ed Alt wrote:> >> The only thing I would want to see is a redundant connection option.  As >> neat as the single bus is, one connection failure at the serial driver >> source does you in no matter what.  Some redundancy is really needed to >> make this have more appeal IMO.  Still a really good step forward though.>> >> -------------------------------------------------->> From: "Bill's Email" <wemodels at cox.net>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 5:02 PM>> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus>> >>> There is a whole page of info as well on the Futaba FASST Site:>>> >>> http://2.4gigahertz.com/sbus/index.html>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion>> _______________________________________________>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion> > _______________________________________________> NSRCA-discussion mailing list> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion> _______________________________________________NSRCA-discussion mailing listNSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.orghttp://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion _______________________________________________NSRCA-discussion mailing listNSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.orghttp://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_1
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20100710/5de19a12/attachment.html>