[NSRCA-discussion] S.bus

[Keith Hoard]

Perhaps someone can develop servos that incorporate the 2.4Ghz receiver
circuitry in each case, as well as a LiPo battery.  Then each servo would be
its own independent little machine.  Maybe have the receiver and battery
come as a snap-on to each servo.  While you're building, you just program
each servo to respond to whatever channel you need to set it up for.
.
.
However, I would think it a pain to have to individually charge each servo
throughout your airplane.
.
.

On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 9:57 AM, <ronlock at comcast.net> wrote:

> A wireless buddy box was being marketed by a vendor at NEAT fair last year.
> I don't recall the name.
>
> Ron Lockhart
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Fuqua" <johnfuqua at embarqmail.com>
> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Friday, July 9, 2010 4:10:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
>
>  Actually I think Futaba now has a wireless buddy box available.
>
>
>
> *From:* nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:
> nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] *On Behalf Of *Atwood, Mark
> *Sent:* Friday, July 09, 2010 12:23 PM
> *To:* General pattern discussion
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
>
>
>
> I’ve been saying that for years…if only we could have wireless power we’d
> be there.
>
>
>
> I’d also like to see Bluetooth Buddy Box systems.
>
>
>
> *Mark Atwood*
>
> *Paragon Consulting, Inc.*  *|*  President
>
> 5885 Landerbrook Drive Suite 130, Cleveland Ohio, 44124
>
> Phone: 440.684.3101 x102  *|*  Fax: 440.684.3102
>
> mark.atwood at paragon-inc.com  *|*  www.paragon-inc.com
>
>
>
> *From:* nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:
> nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] *On Behalf Of *John Fuqua
> *Sent:* Friday, July 09, 2010 12:06 PM
> *To:* 'General pattern discussion'
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
>
>
>
> What would be really cool is a system with wireless servos.   Sort of a
> mini Wi-Fi hotspot.  Now that would be really  useful.
>
>
>
> *From:* nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:
> nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] *On Behalf Of *Jon Lowe
> *Sent:* Friday, July 09, 2010 10:09 AM
> *To:* nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
>
>
>
> There is a great article on latency here:
>
>
>
> http://www.rcmodelreviews.com/what_is_latency.shtml
>
>
>
> A lot of people are hung up on transmitter/receiver latency numbers, and
> don't see the whole picture.  This gives as good a fact based write up as
> any I've seen.
>
> Jon Lowe
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Fuqua <johnfuqua at embarqmail.com>
> To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Fri, Jul 9, 2010 8:48 am
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
>
> How fast is anyone able to practically see a faster "command repetition
>
> rate" anyway and relate it to some surface movement???   We are all ready at
>
> instantaneous
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
>
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org?>] On Behalf Of Ed Alt
>
> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 8:03 AM
>
> To: General pattern discussion
>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
>
>
>
> Not only could the command repetition rate be increased, but you now have a
>
> comms bus that will support duplex communication.  This is a great way to
>
> add telemetry devices.
>
>
>
> Ed
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> From: "James Oddino" <joddino at socal.rr.com>
>
> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 1:26 AM
>
> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
>
>
>
> > I was thinking that maybe now without the pulse width interface, they
>
> > could have three times the rep rate with a digital interface, but who
>
> > knows.  There was a time when I knew what was going on inside RC systems
>
> > so I could decide what was best.  Futaba doesn't seem to care, or maybe
>
> > the marketing guys don't know what is important.
>
> >
>
> > Jim
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > On Jul 8, 2010, at 8:10 PM, Ed Alt wrote:
>
> >
>
> >> The only thing I would want to see is a redundant connection option.  As
>
> >> neat as the single bus is, one connection failure at the serial driver
>
> >> source does you in no matter what.  Some redundancy is really needed to
>
> >> make this have more appeal IMO.  Still a really good step forward though.
>
> >>
>
> >> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >> From: "Bill's Email" <wemodels at cox.net>
>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 5:02 PM
>
> >> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>
> >> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
>
> >>
>
> >>> There is a whole page of info as well on the Futaba FASST Site:
>
> >>>
>
> >>> http://2.4gigahertz.com/sbus/index.html
>
> >>>
>
> >>>
>
> >>> _______________________________________________
>
> >>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>
> >>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>
> >>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> >> _______________________________________________
>
> >> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>
> >> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>
> >> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> >
>
> > _______________________________________________
>
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>



-- 

Keith Hoard
Collierville, TN
khoard at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20100710/8aa02740/attachment.html>