[NSRCA-discussion] S.bus

[James Oddino]

I was thinking that maybe now without the pulse width interface, they could have three times the rep rate with a digital interface, but who knows.  There was a time when I knew what was going on inside RC systems so I could decide what was best.  Futaba doesn't seem to care, or maybe the marketing guys don't know what is important.

Jim


On Jul 8, 2010, at 8:10 PM, Ed Alt wrote:

> The only thing I would want to see is a redundant connection option.  As neat as the single bus is, one connection failure at the serial driver source does you in no matter what.  Some redundancy is really needed to make this have more appeal IMO.  Still a really good step forward though.
> 
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Bill's Email" <wemodels at cox.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 5:02 PM
> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus
> 
>> There is a whole page of info as well on the Futaba FASST Site:
>> 
>> http://2.4gigahertz.com/sbus/index.html
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion