[NSRCA-discussion] C'ARF Integral - Mixing secret?
Woodward, Jim R (US SSA)
jim.woodward at baesystems.com
Tue Jul 6 12:00:38 AKDT 2010
Thanks Bryan,
This plane was so "mixed" up (pun intended) I'll offer this advice to the owner and ask for a report back after this weekend. Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: shinden1 at cox.net [mailto:shinden1 at cox.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 2:50 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Cc: Woodward, Jim R (US SSA)
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] C'ARF Integral - Mixing secret?
Jim ,
The airplane "Is" set up with the c/g too far back, that`s all there is to it.
I`ve fixed way to many of these ,,for the same problem.
Add inc, to the main wing, move the c/g forward to 25% mac .
All these mixes will disappear up elevator with rudder, rudder low throttle , wing dips on hard pull outs ect airplane requiring aileron differential ECT.
Trust me, I fix um all the time.:)
You would be surprised to know how far back you can fly the cg and it seem ok !
---- "Woodward wrote:
> The other test was to simply fly a straight line and cut the power - plane yawed off something fierce. Maybe the fuselage is warped. Rudder cables were snug. Control surfaces were indexed close enough. Wings and stabs were nice and tight against the fuselage. Positive loop tracking, and square loop tracking, with constant throttle position, was very good. Outside loop tracking needed a SLIGHT amount of rudder (certainly no biggy). It was the speed/throttle dependant. Rudder trimmed for uplines, looked very normal and straight down the line.
> Thanks,
> Jim
>
>
>
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of CHV69 at aol.com
> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 2:04 PM
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] C'ARF Integral - Mixing secret?
>
> In a message dated 7/6/2010 2:59:47 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Andrew.Jesky at soaringsoftware.com writes:
> I'm with Jason on this, I have had 3 of these and they havnt had but 2 percent for the downline. Not to say that something couldn't have changed
> In manufacturing but all of my integrals are the same.
> Downline yes I add about 2% down elevator at throttle back so it won't pull to the canopy.
>
> Mine also was off the first cargo container over here. So I wouldn't doubt there were some bugs that needed fixing after the first boat load.
>
> Off my soapbox before the flames start.
>
> Carl
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list