[NSRCA-discussion] C'ARF Integral - Mixing secret?

[Woodward, Jim R (US SSA)]

The other test was to simply fly a straight line and cut the power - plane yawed off something fierce.   Maybe the fuselage is warped.  Rudder cables were snug.  Control surfaces were indexed close enough.  Wings and stabs were nice and tight against the fuselage.  Positive loop tracking, and square loop tracking, with constant throttle position, was very good.  Outside loop tracking needed a SLIGHT amount of rudder (certainly no biggy).  It was the speed/throttle dependant.  Rudder trimmed for uplines, looked very normal and straight down the line.
Thanks,
Jim



From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of CHV69 at aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 2:04 PM
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] C'ARF Integral - Mixing secret?

In a message dated 7/6/2010 2:59:47 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Andrew.Jesky at soaringsoftware.com writes:
I'm with Jason on this, I have had 3 of these and they havnt had but 2 percent for the downline. Not to say that something couldn't have changed
In manufacturing but all of my integrals are the same.
Downline yes I add about 2% down elevator at throttle back so it won't pull to the canopy.

Mine also was off the first cargo container over here. So I wouldn't doubt there were some bugs that needed fixing after the first boat load.

Off my soapbox before the flames start.

Carl
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20100706/73958b9a/attachment.html>