[NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes

[richard wallace]

Mark  -
OUTSTANDING idea ... btw, will you head up the NSRCA committee to work with
PETA to work through their issues with this? .... and the Rules committee to
reinstate the 70's rules for realistic maneuvers that would put  only
pilot-survivable G's on the plane?

Keep up the great work!

On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Atwood, Mark <atwoodm at paragon-inc.com>wrote:

> I think we ought to make a weight change to encourage squirril power.  Its
> "green" with biodegradable emissions, but right now I can only get adequate
> power with the heavier bulky steriod enhanced grey squirrils which make me
> overweight ...
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------
> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org <
> nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>
> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Fri Jan 01 20:47:46 2010
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
>
> Making weight with an SAP-180 is easier than with a YS 170 CDI.  The power
> doesn’t compare, but from a weight perspective, it's no real issue.
>
> Ed
>
> From: Daniel McLalin <mailto:dmclalin at gmail.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 8:35 PM
> To: General pattern discussion <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
>
>
>                John,
>
>
> I just happened to read the discussion on RCU about the SAP 140 and it
> occurred to me that maybe this is why raising the weight limit should be
> considered.  This does not mean I agree, but just for thought.
>
>                , electrics want a weight break because their fuel tanks are
> heavy but their fuel is light; because two strokes aren't competitive any
> more we ought to have a high minimum weight for 4-strokes and electrics to
> level the playing field; and I want a weight break because I added 4 oz when
> I put ignition on my YS's.
>
>        Pandora's box is no problem compared to changing pattern rules.
>
>
>        Jon Lowe
>
>
>        -----Original Message-----
>        From: Daniel McLalin <dmclalin at gmail.com>
>        To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>        Sent: Fri, Jan 1, 2010 5:41 pm
>        Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
>
>
>        Maybe if the weight limit was raised gas engines would become viable
> for pattern?
>        --
>        Regards,
>        Daniel McLalin
>        ____________________
>        Of all the things I ever lost.......................................
> I miss my mind the most!
>
>        www.firehow.com <http://www.firehow.com/>
>        www.premierbowlers.com <http://www.premierbowlers.com/>
>
>        _______________________________________________
>
>
>        NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>
>        NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>
>        http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
>        _______________________________________________
>        NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>        NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>        http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Daniel McLalin
> ____________________
> Of all the things I ever lost....................................... I miss
> my mind the most!
>
> www.firehow.com
> www.premierbowlers.com
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20100102/7041fa2f/attachment.html>