[NSRCA-discussion] More Pattern vs IMAC

[Atwood, Mark]

I agree.  Shouldn't be hard to define an XML layout that would work for this and we already have the unique primary key.  Might be an issue with international competitors, but I'm sure we could get around that.

The big work is on the web site side.

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Duane Beck
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 1:33 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] More Pattern vs IMAC

XML Schema!  :)

Duane

> From: "Derek Koopowitz" <derekkoopowitz at gmail.com>
> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 1:25:48 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] More Pattern vs IMAC
>
> Rather than forcing each CD to use the same scoring software all we
> need to do is come up with a standard reporting format that we can use
> to upload data and then the various scoring programs can be modified
> to create this data file and for the CD to send it to a central
> location.
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.112/2392 - Release Date: 09/25/09 05:51:00