[NSRCA-discussion] Rules Fix Advancement system

[Bill Glaze]

Agreed. Bill Glaze
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: ronlock at comcast.net 
  To: General pattern discussion 
  Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2009 11:30 AM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Fix Advancement system


  One more opinion here-

  Point has been made that for the most part we don't have a sandbagging problem -
  I think that is generally true.  In part because we do have an Advancement process that
  is a foundation upon which peer pressure rests.   I think not having any system is an over 
  reaction.    I am in favor of adjusting, revising, etc, the advancement system as may be 
  helpful.

  Ron Lockhart

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: "Tony" <tony at radiosouthrc.com>
  To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
  Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 10:00:57 AM (GMT-0500) Auto-Detected
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules proposal 11-6 question


  As AMA District 5 VP, I have just signed one as John describes for a D5 member that wanted to move back to Advanced from Masters.  I don’t know of any requests that have been denied by an AMA VP.





  Tony Stillman, President

  Radio South, Inc.

  139 Altama Connector, Box 322

  Brunswick, GA  31525

  1-800-962-7802

  www.radiosouthrc.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of John Konneker
  Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 9:52 AM
  To: Discussion List
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules proposal 11-6 question



  I was curious about this procedure last winter and did some research.
  The form is obtained from the AMA and is filled out in duplicate.
  The requester states his reason for asking to move back.
  He then has a CD and his AMA district contest board member sign it.
  You can find the contest board member list in the back of every other month's Model Aviation or on the AMA website.
  After that it goes to your AMA district VP who forwards both forms on to Muncie after he signs them.
  AMA Muncie does not approve, disapprove, grant or deny these request.  They only place one copy on file
  and return the other copy to the requester.
  Done.
  As a CD I would sign anyone's request that was sincere for whatever the reason.
  I bet the contest board member would be the same.
  The AMA DVP will sign based on the previous recommendations.
  JLK





------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 06:42:14 -0700
  From: humptybump at sbcglobal.net
  To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules proposal 11-6 question

  ...Read section eight of the rule book...



  Under current rules you can move up but not down.  However, there is a very specific exception that allows one to petition the AMA by submitting a form that, once approved, allows reclassification to a lower class due to various reasons including, but not limited to, disability, breaks from flying, etc...



  Richard




------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: Bob Richards <bob at toprudder.com>
  To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
  Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 8:16:46 AM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules proposal 11-6 question

        You mean if I have not flown pattern AT ALL in 12 years, I can fly Intermediate now?? :-)

        --- On Thu, 10/22/09, Joe Lachowski <jlachow at hotmail.com> wrote:



        You know we have a 4 yr sliding scale in effect from the last rules cycle. Has anybody looked at how it has affected oneself in this regard. Just curious. It maybe good enough without makng anymore changes?
       




  _______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20091025/8c0ea865/attachment.html>