[NSRCA-discussion] Rules proposal 11-6 question

[Ron Hansen]

Advancement based on any scoring system won't work because this is a judged
sport.  Shooting is based on real results.  I hit the target at a certain
distance x % of the time.  Local contests are scored in my experience much
more generously than the NATS.  I know this shouldn't be the case but you
have much more experienced judges at the NATs.  It is not uncommon to have
sportsman judging at the local contests.  I agree with Mark, drop the
advancement requirements and use peer pressure for the few that want to
sandbag.

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Martin X.
Moleski, SJ
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 6:11 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules proposal 11-6 question

Bill Glaze wrote:

> We each have the same belief in this matter.  I know it would take some
> organizing, and a lot of data input, but possibly the computer gurus
> could figure out a way for the CD's to input the information in a manner
> that would allow it direct entry into the database.

That **IS** being worked on.

Whether the database would be used to force or encourage
advancement is a separate issue.

				Marty
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4537 (20091023) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com