[NSRCA-discussion] Rules proposal 11-6 question

[Stuart Chale]

8 to 1 middle of the 9th.
In regards to the sequences, I am probably in the minority but I think 
the lower classes need to be a little harder.  Probably even Masters.  
Most areas of the country are seeing a bunching up in Masters.  I like 
it, makes for good competition in that class.  I do not want to come in 
second in my class (and last) :)
Perhaps if the classes were a little more difficult people would not 
move up as quickly.  Put more difficult rolling maneuvers in advanced, 
add some integrated rolling maneuvers into Masters.  Would there be more 
fliers in the lower classes, would the classes be more even?  Don't 
know.  Is this what we want?

Should someone be "prepared" to go to the next higher class from their 
current class?  There needs to be an increase in difficulty which there 
is.  You should have to work at the next class when moving up.

Rollers, love to watch them done well, but can't do them well :)  They 
really do use a lot of real estate though and sort of goes against the 
idea of decreased space use that we have with turnaround.  IMAC has the 
same problem.  They have a score for proper airspace use which includes 
a reduced footprint but has rollers in all 3 or the upper classes :)

Stuart C.