[NSRCA-discussion] Snap

[Dave Burton]

Seems to me that all AMA judging criteria and maneuver descriptions should be the same as FAI. If it’s part of the “notebook” of schedules used in the future so that the pattern community determines the schedules periodically as IMAC is doing, then we want only one set of judging  criteria for all classes. 

Dave Burton

 

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Don Ramsey
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 8:02 AM
To: 'General pattern discussion'
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Snap

 

Ok, how about this for the snap?  “If its not a barrel roll and not an axial roll, it’s a snap.” Maybe have the coning of the tail in the description. This eliminates about 90% of the judging differences.

 

Don

 

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Bob Richards
Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2009 8:09 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] basic judging question (warning 4 letter word)

 


I think changing the judging criteria, just for the snap part of the manuever, would suffice.

--- On Sat, 10/10/09, John Ferrell <jferrell13 at triad.rr.com> wrote:

 

? 

I believe "We could fix most of that, by assigning a low K to snap maneuvers" is the only appropriate solution. If you cast them out, it is giving up. 

 

John Ferrell  W8CCW
 

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.421 / Virus Database: 270.14.9/2427 - Release Date: 10/10/09 06:39:00

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20091011/2a6380f0/attachment.html>