[NSRCA-discussion] Alabama Bound

Dave DaveL322 at comcast.net
Wed Nov 25 06:58:41 AKST 2009


"Everyone is free to choose with whom to associate, and while we in SPA are
sorry to have lost the people who have chosen not to fly with us, that
was/is their choice."

*********True enough!!

 

"I won't go into the many discussions I have had with fellow SPAers about
the direction of AMA pattern, as directed by the NSRCA -- but they are
frequent, and those of us having them choose not to fly AMA"

*********I would note that the direction taken by the NSRCA is based on the
comments/feedback from the NSRCA membership..majority wins..minority is
still welcome, but can choose to go play another game (SPA, BPA, vintage,
etc)..it is nice to have the options.

 

If I had more time, and more of the SPA stuff was happening in my area, I'd
love to put together a Dirty Birdy or Deception (some of my first
planes)...and the power plant would have to be modernized to accommodate
noise..but, personally, I could never be happy with such a plane using a
4C..just doesn't seem right to me.  But I am happy to see others having fun
with the older planes (however much they are being modified) and 4Cs.

 

Regards,

 

Dave

 

 

  _____  

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Phil Spelt
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 10:37 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Alabama Bound

 

Well, Guys,

I was preparing a response to Ron Van Putte, but it appears this is not the
venue for that.  Everyone is free to choose with whom to associate, and
while we in SPA are sorry to have lost the people who have chosen not to fly
with us, that was/is their choice.  If you check with Jason Shulman, you
might find a different perspective.

I won't go into the many discussions I have had with fellow SPAers about the
direction of AMA pattern, as directed by the NSRCA -- but they are frequent,
and those of us having them choose not to fly AMA pattern - but we don't
publicly criticize it, either.  I judged several rounds at an AMA meet last
season, and while I really like the turn around part, the judging reinforced
my decision to fly SPA, only.

BTW, if anyone is interested in some 2-meter stuff (engines and airframes)
you can email me privately...it would be great stuff @ a reasonable price
for entry into 2-meter pattern, and up through Advanced.

At 10:23 AM 11/25/2009, you wrote:



That's the reason I quite SPA also. 4-cycles!!  There is not much challenge
flying the old pattern with a overpowered (90 4c) engine.  That was what
made it hard!  The scavenge-pot 60's didn't really have enough power, so you
had to FLY the airplane.. If they are allowing 90 4c engines, why not allow
ANY power plant!
 
Tony Stillman, President
Radio South, Inc.
139 Altama Connector, Box 322
Brunswick, GA  31525
1-800-962-7802
www.radiosouthrc.com <http://www.radiosouthrc.com/> 

  _____  

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [
<mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>
mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Pete Cosky
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 10:20 AM
To: jpavlick at idseng.com; General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Alabama Bound
 
I'm with you John. When I was into racing anything vintage had to
be....well...vintage.

----- Original Message ----- 

From: John Pavlick <mailto:jpavlick at idseng.com>  

To: General pattern discussion <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>  

Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 10:13 AM

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Alabama Bound

 

Electrics in SPA? Jeez, that's kind of hard to stomach. Next they're going
to allow electronic fuel-injection and anti-lock brakes in Vintage Sports
Car Racing. LOL

 

John Pavlick

 



--- On Wed, 11/25/09, Jerry Combs <jcombs1947 at att.net> wrote:

From: Jerry Combs <jcombs1947 at att.net>

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Alabama Bound

To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>

Date: Wednesday, November 25, 2009, 9:50 AM

I don't understand the 13" prop bit either.  On my Axi 4130-20 on 6 cells a
13" prop gives me around 500 watts.

Jerry

Scott, What is the reason behind a 13 inch prop limit for electric? There

isn't any limit on prop sizes for IC engines is there? A flyer with an IC

engine searches for the best prop size to the particular plane and engine

combo, it seems that electric flyers should have the same flexibility.

Dave Burton 

_______________________________________________

NSRCA-discussion mailing list

NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
<http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.o
rg> 

http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

  _____  

_______________________________________________

NSRCA-discussion mailing list

NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org

http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

--> There are only two types of aircraft -- fighters and targets.

Phil Spelt, Past President, Knox County Radio Control Society, Inc.
       URL: http://www.kcrctn.com <http://www.kcrctn.com/> 
AMA--1294,  Scientific Leader Member, SPA--177
      My URL: http://mywebpages.comcast.net/~chuenkan/
      (865) 435-1476 v  (865) 604-0541 c 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20091125/3721e56d/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list