[NSRCA-discussion] Advancement System
jonlowe at aol.com
jonlowe at aol.com
Sat May 9 18:28:13 AKDT 2009
Completely different animal. They have to stop rotation to reverse direction. Eats up a LOT more space.
-----Original Message-----
From: John Pavlick <jpavlick at idseng.com>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Sat, 9 May 2009 9:10 pm
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Advancement System
Yup that's what I tried to point out a while
ago. But nobody ever listens to me anyway...
John Pavlick
http://www.idseng.com
----- Original Message -----
From:
Chuck
Hochhalter
To: General pattern discussion
Sent: Saturday, May 09, 2009 12:15
PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion]
Advancement System
Anyone notice how much airpace 3 rolls takes in FAI...
I don’t think they lower class has the box management skills to fit 3 rolls
into the box, let alone be ready to center them.
Chuck
From: ronlock at comcast.net
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 9:25 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Advancement
System
Re comments
below-
I believe part of reason the current Intermediate sequence has two
rolls, and not three, is-
Figuring two rolls are challenge and training
enough for most intermediate pilots -
And two is enough for judging-
=2
0Particularly, if you see two going badly, not many of us
want to see a
third.
Also below - having to move out of Sportsman after first year
because of beating 4 other pilots -
That is already fixed. The 2009
rule "..flier must move out of Sportsman class at the end of he calendar
year of his/her second or subsequent year of participation if he/she places
first or second and above at least 4 other fliers..."
Ron
Lockhart
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Hansen"
<rcpilot at wowway.com>
To: "General pattern discussion"
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 10:03:36
PM (GMT-0500) Auto-Detected
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Advancement
System
I’ve been flying
intermediate for about 3 years going on 4. The two rolls
are still kicking my you know what. I can do one slow roll
and one 4 pt roll but not two consecutive rolls. I’m
certain that the average advance pilot would really have trouble with 3
rolls. I see a lot of intermediate, advanced and sometimes
even masters pilots almost loose airplanes on the
horizontal rolling maneuvers. They shouldn’t be
underestimated.
I agree with Mark,
lets make advancement at all levels a guideline. I had to
move up from sportsman to intermediate after my first year in sportsman
because I beat
4 other pilots. I was flying a Kaos and the other pilots were all flying their
1st contests with trainers. They had no
chance. In the end I’m glade I moved up but at the time it
made me real nervous. I was so determined to fly pattern
that I decided to give it the old college try in
intermediate.
I think Advance could
use a few more maneuvers that exit inverted. Otherwise, I
believe all the sequences are pretty good.
Ron
-----Original
Message-----
From:
nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Richard Lewis
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 4:38
PM
To: General pattern
discussion
Subject: Re:
[NSRCA-discussion] Advancement System
There is a provision in the current rule
set to accomodate these situations, see 8.1.2 of the competition
regulations....
Richard
From:
"jeffghughes at comcast.net" <jeffghughes at comcast.net>
To: General pattern discussion
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 3:30:24
PM
Subject: Re:
[NSRCA-discussion] Advancement System
Bob,
I understand
completely, I moved up to advanced, then my daughter got sick and I've been to
=2
0 one contest in 4 years. My flying has regressed, and my confidence along with
it.
Jeff
----- Original
Message -----
From: "Mark Atwood" <atwoodm at paragon-inc.com>
To:
"General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent:
Friday, May 8, 2009 2:52:19 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re:
[NSRCA-discussion] Advancement System
I know
you’re joking some Bob, but I think you’re actually a great example of someone
that was able to fly a lot, and progressed nicely through the system, but then
when you got to Masters…a time when you really need to practice even more to
be competitive, your job suddenly changed, home life became more
complex, and you’re lucky to fly 10 practice flights a year outside of
contests. Your experience and skill would allow you to be
competitive in Advanced, without dominating and likely have a lot more fun
being a spoiler to that crowd, rather than trying to fly masters without
hardly even knowing the pattern.
You’re
the perfect candidate for someone that should be able to choose where they fly
(which pattern) and have the most enjoyment.
From:
nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Bob Kane
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 2:40
PM
To: General pattern
20 discussion
Subject: Re:
[NSRCA-discussion] Advancement System
Hey, I resemble
that remark . . . . . . .
Bob
Kane
getterflash at yahoo.com
From:
"jeffghughes at comcast.net" <jeffghughes at comcast.net>
To: General pattern discussion
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Cc: Don Ramsey
<don.ramsey at suddenlink.net>
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 12:17:58
PM
Subject: Re:
[NSRCA-discussion] Advancement System
This is all pretty
interesting. From my perspective, I didn't really care who beat me when
I was in intermediate or advanced. I just knew that I was seeing the skill
level necessary to win. While it's nice to win a trophy in the lower classes,
I understood I wasn't competing against the best pilots anyway. From
what I've seen there is a huge variation of talent within a class
anyway. I've seen Masters pilots fly that wouldn't win in advanced if
they bumped back down (maybe not even in intermediate). People move up for
all kinds of reasons unrelated to skill level. It's also
interesting that we talk about using each class to improve our flying until we
get to Masters, then it appears nobody wants to improve to FAI.
No virus found in
this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.285 / Virus Database:
270.12.21/2103 - Release Date: 05/07/09 18:05:00
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
__________ Information from ESET
NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4063 (20090508)
__________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090510/5bcbf5b2/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list