[NSRCA-discussion] Futaba 12 FG question
Ken Thompson
KTHOMPSON56 at satx.rr.com
Wed May 6 16:16:46 AKDT 2009
LOL!! It's all good Bob, I read it the same way, just pokin' fun<VBG>
----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Richards
To: Ken Thompson ; General pattern discussion
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Futaba 12 FG question
Ummm, I don't know. Ask him. Go back and read his original message:
> >> When I turn on my 12FGA 2.4 TX it takes all my 2.4 ghz receivers (7
> >> ch, 8 ch, 14 ch) about 1 or 2 seconds before any control surfaces
> >> neutralize.
Anyway, nevermind, I was just trying analyze the situation and obviously misinterpreted what he meant. Forget I said anything. :-)
Bob R.
--- On Wed, 5/6/09, Ken Thompson <KTHOMPSON56 at satx.rr.com> wrote:
Ummmm...why would one turn on the receiver first and then the transmitter?
----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Richards
To: General pattern discussion
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 4:15 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Futaba 12 FG question
I think you guys are on the wrong track.
The problem (as I read it) is that the rx is already on, but when he turns the TRANSMITTER on, there is a delay before the rx responds.
All the replies I have read thus far (I think) refer to the delay when you turn the RECEIVER on. I can see how a regulator might cause a delay when you turn the receiver on, but it should have nothing to do with a delay when you turn the transmitter on.
The only thing I can think of regarding the transmitter turn-on delay would have to do with possible software version in the transmitter, or possibly whether or not there are other 2.4g transmitters on when you turn on YOUR transmitter (the receiver might be trying to sample the others looking for the right one).
Bob R.
--- On Tue, 5/5/09, Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net> wrote:
From: Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Futaba 12 FG question
To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Date: Tuesday, May 5, 2009, 11:01 PM
Regulators! Mine is a Jaccio as well. I don't know what John uses.
Ron
On May 5, 2009, at 8:49 PM, Archie Stafford wrote:
> I noticed this when I was running different brand regulators. My
> planes did
> this when I was flying duralite regulators. It even happens on a
> friends
> airplane as well as the airplane he bought from me. My Tech Aero
> regulators
> do it as well. However the plane I have with Jaccio stuff
> doesn't. I have
> no explanation as to why, just something I have discovered.
>
> Arch
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ron
> Van Putte
> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 7:13 PM
> To: General pattern discussion
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Futaba 12 FG question
>
> I hope someone can help John out. It's really bugging him. When he
> told me what his system is doing, I responded that my system's
> response is instantaneous. He didn't believe me and bet a beer that
> my system was as slow as his. He lost the beer and I think that PO'd
> him as much as anything.
>
> Ron
>
> On May 5, 2009, at 7:04 PM, John Fuqua wrote:
>
>> I have an interesting and perplexing thing going on with my 12 FGA
>> Futaba 2.4ghz transmitter that is not duplicated by others here
>> locally. I thought I would throw it out to the list and see if
>> anyone else has noticed this anomaly.
>>
>>
>>
>> When I turn on my 12FGA 2.4 TX it takes all my 2.4 ghz receivers (7
>> ch, 8 ch, 14 ch) about 1 or 2 seconds before any control surfaces
>> neutralize. With Ron Van Putte's 12 FGA 2.4 and his 14 ch rx it
>> is instantaneous. We checked a 14MZ 2.4 tx with an 8 ch Rx and it
>> is about the same as Ron's.
>>
>>
>>
>> Has anyone else using the 12 FGA noticed this. This does not seem
>> to affect performance but I am puzzled why I see this time
>> differential to neutralize.
>>
>>
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
--------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090507/46bd7630/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list