[NSRCA-discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence

[Vicente "Vince" Bortone]

We send the proposal already early this year.   It is exactly like Brian mention below.  It is up to AMA and NSRCA to get it done.  If you want to read a copy send me and e-mail.  I will forward to you. 



Vicente "Vince" Bortone   
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brian" < brian_w_young @yahoo.com> 
To: "General pattern discussion" < nsrca -discussion at lists. nsrca .org> 
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2009 8:43:48 AM GMT -07:00 US/Canada Mountain 
Subject: Re: [ NSRCA -discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence 

My tendancy is to want to adopt the FAI but make some revisions that keep it in the realm of possibilities for all current pilots flying masters as well as the current  planes. There is some stuff in the FAI that would cause a loss in participation if masters adopts it absolutly .   

-----Original Message----- 
From: Bob Kane < getterflash @yahoo.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 8:27 AM 
To: General pattern discussion < nsrca -discussion at lists. nsrca .org> 
Subject: Re: [ NSRCA -discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence 


I'm with you on this one . . .  There might have been a time when the Masters and FAI schedules were interchangeable, but not anymore. For me personally it is the rolling circles or loops that would knock me out. I have enough trouble making straight rolls look good. 

 Bob Kane 
getterflash @yahoo.com 



----- Original Message ---- 
From: Ron Van Putte < vanputte @cox.net> 
To: General pattern discussion < nsrca -discussion at lists. nsrca .org> 
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2009 10:15:53 AM 
Subject: Re: [ NSRCA -discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence 

Let me post a dissenting input.  If the Master class pilots were "plenty good enough" to fly the FAI P maneuver schedule, we'd be in FAI .  I have no desire to fly the FAI P or any other FAI sequence that is selected by anyone else but pilots in the U.S.  The Master class is the U.S. destination class.  Leave FAI and its maneuver schedules to those who want to compete on the international level. 

Rant over. 

Ron 

On May 5, 2009, at 9:02 AM, michael s harrison wrote: 

> Joe, 
> 
> It has probably been mentioned before but I would recommend simply using the existing-whatever is at that time- FAI P pattern for the masters sequence and allow it to be replaced by the upcoming P pattern every cycle.  The pilots are plenty good enough and it would really simplify things and put everyone on the same page.  I believe it would be exciting and fun. 
> 
> Mike 
> 
> 
> 
> From: nsrca -discussion-bounces at lists. nsrca .org [ mailto : nsrca -discussion-bounces at lists. nsrca .org] On Behalf Of Joe Lachowski 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 8:05 AM 
> To: NSRCA Discussion List 
> Subject: [ NSRCA -discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence 
> 
> 
> 
> There has been some discussion on whether it is time to shorten the length of the Masters sequence for 2011. A Poll has been set up on RCU to get the current crop of Masters pilots and future Masters pilots opinions. 
> 
> http :// www . rcuniverse .com/forum/m_8742141/ tm . htm 
> 
> Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync. Check it out. 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> NSRCA -discussion mailing list 
> NSRCA -discussion at lists. nsrca .org 
> http ://lists. nsrca .org/mailman/listinfo/ nsrca -discussion 

_______________________________________________ 
NSRCA -discussion mailing list 
NSRCA -discussion at lists. nsrca .org 
http ://lists. nsrca .org/mailman/listinfo/ nsrca -discussion 



       
_______________________________________________ 
NSRCA -discussion mailing list 
NSRCA -discussion at lists. nsrca .org 
http ://lists. nsrca .org/mailman/listinfo/ nsrca -discussion 
_______________________________________________ 
NSRCA -discussion mailing list 
NSRCA -discussion at lists. nsrca .org 
http ://lists. nsrca .org/mailman/listinfo/ nsrca -discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090506/b5a8ce4b/attachment.html>