[NSRCA-discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence

[verne at twmi.rr.com]

I wouldn't be against a shorter schedule. I just prefer that we control what's in it.

Verne


---- Archie Stafford <astafford at swtexas.net> wrote: 
> Verne,
> 
> This started when I suggested to the sequence committee that we need to
> shorten the masters pattern.  Flying it is fine, but I think we need to take
> into account the guys who have to sit and judge it.  I heard several guys in
> FAI judging this weekend about how long a sequence it is.  Which wouldn't be
> near as bad except for the fact Masters is usually the largest class at most
> contests.  I think we need to consider the length of time in the judges
> chair for those that have to judge it as well.
> 
> Arch
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of mike mueller
> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 10:31 AM
> To: General pattern discussion
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence
> 
> 
>  The current pattern puts E. guys at a bit of a disadvantage. It pushes my
> setup a little further than I prefer. It is a great pattern and I compliment
> the designers for having a nice flow. Mike
> 
> 
> --- On Tue, 5/5/09, verne at twmi.rr.com <verne at twmi.rr.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: verne at twmi.rr.com <verne at twmi.rr.com>
> > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence
> > To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> > Date: Tuesday, May 5, 2009, 10:24 AM
> > If it sounded as though I were complaining that the current
> > Masters schedule takes too long, I wasn't. Just
> > commenting that it takes a lot longer than the previous one.
> > For me, eight minutes from takeoff to landing approach (my
> > timer is started on takeoff and is almost always beeping
> > during my landing). I fly at what I would call a medium
> > speed most of the time. 
> > 
> > I'm also against flying the FAI-P schedule. I'd
> > rather fly a home-grown variant that we create ourselves.
> > 
> > Verne Koester
> > 
> > 
> > ---- Stuart Chale <schale at optonline.net> wrote: 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > >
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> 
>       
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion