[NSRCA-discussion] Fwd: New fast charge battery

[Derek Koopowitz]

I did... but it was 1/8 scale glow back in the mid 70's.

2009/3/19 John Pavlick <jpavlick at idseng.com>

>   How many of you E-heads ever raced R/C cars competitively? Just curious.
>
>
> John Pavlick
>
> --- On *Thu, 3/19/09, Rex <trexlesh at msn.com>* wrote:
>
> From: Rex <trexlesh at msn.com>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fwd: New fast charge battery
> To: "NSRCA-discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Date: Thursday, March 19, 2009, 6:02 AM
>
>
> I'm the guy that submitted the info that got bashed...  lol
> As I was told, the reality of the charges in the batteries we use today,
> only receive about half of the charge they can actually take, because of
> the
> crystaline structure inside...  I suppose that's what some of this quick
> charge
> structure is eluding to.  The article I read stated that scientists have
> figured out
> how to get a better charge structure so the batteries will actually fill
> with charge.
> This would more than double the mAh of the battery.  They had already been
> using
> this technology on their own laptops and cell phones, and were getting
> twice the
> run time....
> I read a few of the other articles attached to the link you provided...
> They elude
> to exactly what I was talking about.  If all of this is indeed going to be
> available to
> us in the near future,  most all of our electrical problems using batteries
> will be
> eliminated, except we will have to adjust by using bigger, more powerful
> motors and
> esc's....  Wouldn't that be horrible?  lol
> At the NW model Expo in March, a guy came to the NSRCA booth and began
> talking
> about all of this, stating that his son was working on this technology.
> Pretty much
> everything that he talked about was somewhat discussed in the articles.
> Pretty exciting, but it's like everything else...  we are only going to see
> and hear
> tidbits of what's going on.  They need to dangle the carrot, to get
> investment
> capitol.
>
> Rex
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> From: joddino at socal.rr.com
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:28:00 -0700
> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Fwd: New fast charge battery
>
> A buddy sent me this and I know it has been discussed here but....  I read
> the comments at the time and couldn't figure out why you guys were
> dismissing it so quickly.  It seems to me it is exactly what we need.  To
> charge and discharge fast you need extremely low internal resistance and we
> like that, so our voltage doesn't drop under high current loads.  More power
> to the motor.  Instead of 80 Amps at 35 volts you might get 95 Amps at 41
> volts.  At that point we might need better motors and ESCs but the batteries
> wouldn't be the limiting factor in the power train.  It is definitely a step
> in the right direction.  Any comments?
> Jim O
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>  *From: *Chas J Manzo <cmanzo at sbcglobal.net>
> *Date: *March 18, 2009 4:52:31 PM PDT
> *To: *Robert Halvorsen <robert.halvorsen at sbcglobal.net>, Terry Johnson <
> terryljohnson at verizon.net>, Jim Oddino <joddino at socal.rr.com>
> *Subject: **Fw: New fast charge battery*
> *Reply-To: *cmanzo at sbcglobal.net
>
>
>
> --- On *Mon, 3/16/09, George Romain <gromain at dslextreme.com>* wrote:
>
> From: George Romain <gromain at dslextreme.com>
> Subject: New fast charge battery
> To:
> Date: Monday, March 16, 2009, 7:40 PM
>
> New Batteries
> http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/health/ultra-high-power-lithium-ion-battery-charges-in-seconds_100165457.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing listNSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.orghttp://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090319/d8eaac46/attachment.html>