[NSRCA-discussion] Fwd: New fast charge battery

[Rex]

Ya, you're right....  what was I thinking?  lol

In the real world, all this would allow  for smaller, lighter batteries.

Making weight would be a cinch, allowing a lot more planes to be used

for electric power.
 


From: jnhiller at earthlink.net
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:29:51 -0700
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fwd: New fast charge battery







Hay Rex how much power do you need? You can do a vertical ROG now.
Jim
 
-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Rex
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 11:03 PM
To: NSRCA-discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fwd: New fast charge battery
 
I'm the guy that submitted the info that got bashed...  lol
As I was told, the reality of the charges in the batteries we use today, 
only receive about half of the charge they can actually take, because of the
crystaline structure inside...  I suppose that's what some of this quick charge
structure is eluding to.  The article I read stated that scientists have figured out
how to get a better charge structure so the batteries will actually fill with charge.
This would more than double the mAh of the battery.  They had already been using
this technology on their own laptops and cell phones, and were getting twice the 
run time....  
I read a few of the other articles attached to the link you provided...  They elude
to exactly what I was talking about.  If all of this is indeed going to be available to
us in the near future,  most all of our electrical problems using batteries will be 
eliminated, except we will have to adjust by using bigger, more powerful motors and
esc's....  Wouldn't that be horrible?  lol
At the NW model Expo in March, a guy came to the NSRCA booth and began talking 
about all of this, stating that his son was working on this technology.  Pretty much 
everything that he talked about was somewhat discussed in the articles.
Pretty exciting, but it's like everything else...  we are only going to see and hear
tidbits of what's going on.  They need to dangle the carrot, to get investment 
capitol.  
 
Rex
 

 



From: joddino at socal.rr.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:28:00 -0700
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Fwd: New fast charge battery

A buddy sent me this and I know it has been discussed here but....  I read the comments at the time and couldn't figure out why you guys were dismissing it so quickly.  It seems to me it is exactly what we need.  To charge and discharge fast you need extremely low internal resistance and we like that, so our voltage doesn't drop under high current loads.  More power to the motor.  Instead of 80 Amps at 35 volts you might get 95 Amps at 41 volts.  At that point we might need better motors and ESCs but the batteries wouldn't be the limiting factor in the power train.  It is definitely a step in the right direction.  Any comments? 
 
Jim O
 
Begin forwarded message:
 
From: Chas J Manzo <cmanzo at sbcglobal.net>
Date: March 18, 2009 4:52:31 PM PDT
To: Robert Halvorsen <robert.halvorsen at sbcglobal.net>, Terry Johnson <terryljohnson at verizon.net>, Jim Oddino <joddino at socal.rr.com>
Subject: Fw: New fast charge battery
Reply-To: cmanzo at sbcglobal.net










--- On Mon, 3/16/09, George Romain <gromain at dslextreme.com> wrote:

From: George Romain <gromain at dslextreme.com>
Subject: New fast charge battery
To: 
Date: Monday, March 16, 2009, 7:40 PMNew Batteries http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/health/ultra-high-power-lithium-ion-battery-charges-in-seconds_100165457.html 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090319/e0dae93b/attachment.html>