[NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?
mike mueller
mups1953 at yahoo.com
Fri Jul 31 05:08:27 AKDT 2009
Where do I sign up?
The local pattern guys don't use the site from what I understand. If you go there on a weekday in the spring the place is deserted. I've been there and been the only plane in the air. Mike
--- On Fri, 7/31/09, Ed Alt <ed_alt at hotmail.com> wrote:
> From: Ed Alt <ed_alt at hotmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?
> To: "'General pattern discussion'" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 7:47 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I wish to register a
> complaint. What form do I sign? J The
> AMA site is inconveniently located for my normal weekend
> practice. Why are my
> dues supporting a tiny fraction of AMA membership to have
> access to a flying site
> that I can’t drive to easily? In other words,
> who cares about the complaints of
> the locals. It’s OUR site and the vocal
> minority have exclusive access for the
> rest of the year. Tough noogies.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On
> Behalf Of Joe
> Lachowski
>
> Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 8:36 AM
>
> To: NSRCA Discussion List
>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll -
> Relocate the Nats in 2010?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> It
> really isn't just about cutting costs either. It is
> also about other AMA
> membership complaining about the site not being available
> for their use. You
> would not believe the number of complaints AMA has had
> about the AMA site being
> tied up. That is why the overall Nats at the site has been
> shortened in length.
>
>
>
>
> If you are on 72, better plan on moving over to SS in the
> future. I've heard
> rumours that the AMA has been considering making the AMA
> site SS only in the
> future.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:57:16 -0700
>
> From: homeremodeling2003 at yahoo.com
>
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the
> Nats in 2010?
>
>
>
>
> This
> is really funny. They
> want to bring the nats to 2 weeks to cut costs. I am sure
> they make money the
> way it is. Take this for what it is, heresay, but I
> heard that the
> members of the club were complaining that the nats takes
> too much of their
> time away from their field for them to fly. Wasn't
> the field built for a
> localized nats site? And I'm pretty sure we all paid
> for it. The ama will
> lose out if they go to a 2 weeks nats IMO. Wait till they
> see entry's
> decline.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Thu, 7/30/09, Tony
> <tony at radiosouthrc.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Tony <tony at radiosouthrc.com>
>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the
> Nats in 2010?
>
> To: "'General pattern discussion'"
> <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>
> Date: Thursday, July 30, 2009, 12:55 PM
>
>
> That is a possibility also.
> AMA is thinking about returning
> the NATS to a 2 week all-events NATS like used to be
> done. If all
> events are together, HQ can put all costs into one
> effort. If they are
> all split up, Each group would have more costs to deal
> with due to the fact
> that HQ can’t send a group of people to every
> site.
>
> Tony Stillman,
> President
> Radio South, Inc.
> 139 Altama Connector, Box
> 322
> Brunswick, GA
> 31525
> 1-800-962-7802
> www.radiosouthrc.com
>
>
>
> From:
> nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On
> Behalf Of Tim
> Taylor
>
> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 3:39 PM
>
> To: General pattern discussion
>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll -
> Relocate the Nats in
> 2010?
>
>
>
>
>
> It was done, It was called
> NPAC
>
>
>
>
>
> Tim
>
>
>
> --- On Thu, 7/30/09, Bill's Email
> <wemodels at cox.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> From: Bill's Email <wemodels at cox.net>
>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate
> the Nats in 2010?
>
> To: " General pattern discussion "
> <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>
> Date: Thursday, July 30, 2009, 2:06 PM
>
> Why not allow the SIGS to do their
> own thing? IMAC and
> NSRCA do not need to share a site. The LSF can find a
> site for the soaring
> NATS. Pylon knows what venues work for them and so on.
> FF can do their own
> thing as well. Why tie soaring and FF together and so
> on??
>
>
>
>
>
> Tony wrote:
>
> Matt:
>
> Yes, it is just difficult to tell if it is actually
> feasible… The
> problem is that it requires a large site for
> Pattern/Pylon/IMAC and will
> require another large site for Soaring/Outdoor
> FF. It may be very
> difficult to actually find places that can handle this
> group.
>
>
>
>
>
> Tony Stillman,
> President
>
> Radio South, Inc.
>
> 139 Altama Connector, Box
> 322
> Brunswick, GA
> 31525
> 1-800-962-7802
>
> www.radiosouthrc.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Windows
> Live™ Hotmail®: Celebrate the moment with your
> favorite sports pics. Check it out.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list